Brit-Am Discussion Group |
Contents by Subject |
Research Recognition Reconciliation Contribute |
Site Map Contents in Alphabetical Order |
This Site |
Relevance to Brit-Am: |
.... Gorg suggested reading the broken name as an archaic form for "Israel" and argued that it could have been copied during the Nineteenth Dynasty from an earlier list. As his publication was in German, his proposal has so far been unavailable to a wider English- speaking readership. Two scholars, Bryant Wood and James Hoffmeier, have briefly discussed Gorg's proposal;4 while the former welcomed it, the latter rejected it on linguistic grounds. The present authors republish the relief fragment here in English and include new evidence that appears to support Gorg's original reading.6
..... The topographical sequence of the name IA-Sr-il/YA-Sr-il on the Berlin pedestal relief occurs together with Ashkelon and Canaan and therefore closely resembles the topographical names listed in close proximity to Israel on the Israel Stele (i.e., Pa-Canaan, Ashkelon, Gezer, Yenoam, Israel).54 The proximity of the names in both documents seems to suggest that both texts are related in some way and that both could date to the Figure . ... (Gorg tentatively suggested the reign of Ramesses II for the Berlin relief) and that their geographical nearness suggests the identification with the same topographical entity within central Palestine. For what other name in the same general region would be so strikingly reminiscent of that of biblical Israel?55 As a matter of fact, no linguistically feasible name is attested in any of the extant texts, so "Israel" remains the most logical candidate... (1)
The name "Israel" (as a personal name unrelated to the biblical people of Israel) is attested in ancient Near Eastern documents from the Bronze Age, where it is written with .: I.-ra-il and perhaps I-sar-il, as well as I.srail (at Early Bronze Age Ebla and Late Bronze Age Ugarit, respectively).66 ... Consequently, we would like to emphasize that the reading of "Israel" on the Berlin pedestal relief is at least possible for two main reasons. First, since there exists linguistic evidence that the original name "Israel" could have been written with sh. (for instance, based on the verb y.sh.r), the Egyptian use of S (instead of sh as on Merenptah's Israel Stele) does not preclude the possibility that the name was originally written with sh . in West Semitic.75 Second, and more significantly, the geographical proximity of IA-Sr-il/YA-Sr-il to Ashkelon and Canaan makes the identification with Israel likely. No known location (especially so near to those two familiar geographical entities) has a name so reminiscent of the biblical name "Israel." As stated above, we tentatively ascribe the Berlin pedestal relief to the reign of Ramesses II. Although the reference to "Israel" in association with Ashkelon and Canaan recalls the reference from the reign of Merenptah, a Ramesside date is by no means certain. Gorg originally ascribed the block to the reign of Amenhotep II due to the archaic renderings of the names "Ashkelon" and "Canaan". Giveon preferred a date during the reign of Amenhotep III, which was tentatively accepted by Shmuel Ahituv.77
... It is is not surprising,
as the classical Jewish historian Flavius Josephus equated the
biblical Exodus with the expulsion of the Hyksos
from Egypt.82
Some scholars wish to go beyond the stage of vague memories at this
point and argue in favor of a complex sociopolitical situation at the
end of the Hyksos
period that could have included ethnic and social
groups, such as the Proto-Israelites, who migrated from Egypt and
brought many of the well-fortified Canaanite Bronze Age cities to
their knees.83 Yohanan Aharoni
and (recently) Aaron Burke have
argued that the political and military situation at the end of the
Middle Bronze Age was reminiscent of the descriptions of Canaan
found in the biblical stories, as they portray a country that was
strongly fortified by impressive urban defenses.84 This situation is
completely different from that during the subsequent Late Bronze
Age (especially so during Late Bronze Age II85), when, according to Rivka Gonen,
the Canaanite towns were frequently unfortified and
therefore did not fit the biblical descriptions well.86 John Bimson
and Bryant Wood have shown that the biblical story of the capture
of Jericho (Tell es-Sultan)
so closely resembles the archaeological circumstances
regarding the destruction of
Jericho's impressive
Middle Bronze Age fortifications that one is inclined to believe the
two must be related one way or another.87
2. IA-Sr-il/YA-Sr-il
and Proto-Israelite Migrations
How would this relate to the name IA-Sr-il/YA-Sr-il on the Berlin relief? If the
name refers to biblical Israel, and if it was located in Canaan (as seems to be
indicated by its association with Ashkelon
and Canaan), and if the names had been copied from an
earlier source (supported by the archaic orthography of all three
names on the slab), this would indeed suggest that Proto-Israelites
had migrated to Canaan sometime nearer the middle of the second millenium bce.
Naturally, this proposition will need to be
supported by additional archaeological and epigraphic evidence.
3. Archaeology: Brit-Am Version of
Explorator
13.43
Pleased with what you have read?
Click Here to make an offering. |
|
|