Official Symbol of Brit-Am
Brit-Am
DNA and
Anthropology Updates
Brit-Am
Research
Revelation
Reconciliation
The Brit-Am Rose
Official Symbol of Brit-Am
| Site Contents by Subject |
Home Research Revelation Reconciliation |
  Publications |
Site Map Contents in Alphabetical Order |
 This Site |
The results of our study reveal that the frequency of mtDNA
haplogroups in the Czech population is similar to the frequencies obtained in
other European countries, especially Poland, Germany, and Russia. On the
contrary, significant differences in haplogroup frequency were found between the
Czech and Finnish populations (haplogroups U, T, W) and populations from
Bulgaria and Turkey (haplogroups H).
the reduction in the frequency of haplogroup I in Denmark since the
Viking and Iron Age, or changes of frequency in haplogroups in England since the
11th c. AD, such as the reduction of U5a1 and the increase in H may in fact be
due to selection. H was present -although not very frequent- in Neolithic
farmers from Central Europe, Corded Ware people from Eulau, and its very high
present-day frequency in Europeans (roughly 50%) as there is no plausible source
or mechanism that would have brought large numbers of it in Europe.
argiedude says:
http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2009/09/balloux-in-heredity-on-mitochondrial.html
N1a was 25% of the farmers but today it's only 0,25%. So you think it's because
of natural selection...
Then why is N1a also just 0,25% of the Middle East?
The mtdna of Europe and the Middle East includes half a dozen major haplogroups.
If evolution preferred some haplogroup so as to lead to a 100-fold reduction of
the original mtdna, then it would almost certainly consist of a single
haplogroup, not U, H, T, J, K, etc. The mtdna distribution throughout Europe is
incredibly homogenous. Why aren't there differential frequencies of certain
haplogroups in the cold north or dry southwest? Different climates, different
adaptive advantageous.
Europe's mtdna is virtually identical in every corner of the continent.
Extracts:
Instead of assuming that J1 was created 30,000 years ago and as a result Abraham
was also living 30,000 years ago, or somewhere near, he took the information in
front of him and interpreted it in a more holistic manner. It confirmed to him
that Abraham was the common ancestor of both the Jews and Arabs. He visualised
the elements of J1 and R1b moving together as the markers of two separate groups
moved towards each other. The markers would do so by virtue of their existing
ancestral pattern that would force those markers into a preordained route that
would eventually force them to overlap. This convergence makes it impossible to
unravel the past, except through the use of known ancestral pattern. Many of
those who are now in the R1b tree have consequently been misclassified as having
always been in the R1b tree. Ancestral pattern shows their origins as being in
the Middle East, along with all J1s and J2s. This mapping shows the new
understanding of where these groups fit and can be found at Annex 11
Other points
http://www.ogmium.com/clannamile/index3.html
The first thing he decided to look at was how DNA markers are dated. At the very
first turn of the page he realised that the science, which he believed was an
absolute science, was not as absolute as he had expected. The problems originate
from the fact that the study of genetics related to tracing family origins is
only a very recent science. DNA had only become common and a mass market
business in the previous ten to twenty years. Indeed the last ten years had
brought so many advances in technologies applied to that art that it was
difficult for even those who are interested to keep up with all the new
developments and discoveries.
Then another new controversy materialised, as large numbers of the population
started to take genetic tests to find their relatives. Those who embarked upon
this journey were looking for close matches with others in the databases, which
were held by the genetic testing companies. As a result of more and more people
publishing their test results through the internet other anomalies have suddenly
appeared. It was found that markers have mutated between cousins in the same
family, when estimates calculated through population studies predicted that
these same markers would not mutate for hundreds or even thousands of years.
This evidence indicated a serious flaw in genetic dating methods and seriously
discredited any dating related to population statistics that had been made in
the last few years.
Others had found that mutations may possibly be created through stress or local
environmental circumstances.
Join the Brit-Am Ephraimite Discussion Group
Just Send an
e-mail
with "Subscribe"
in the Subject Line
Main Page
Offerings and Publications
Return to
Question and Answer
Table of Contents