BAMAD. |
Brit-Am Discussion Group |
Contents by Subject |
Research Recognition Reconciliation Contribute |
Site Map Contents in Alphabetical Order |
This Site |
Hello Yair. With regard to the articles referenced in your BAMAD 93 edition, the claim of #1 (2) "Virtual non-Existence of R1b in Ancient Europe!" appears to be spurious and illogical. In the first place, the website cited by no means shows all the available evidence or even a reasonable sampling of dna specimens to draw any conclusion. By your logic, that the chart shows a single example of two specimens found in a cave dated to somewhere around 1000 BC means that no R1b carrying humans inhabited Europe prior to that date would also have to mean that because that chart shows no other specimens between those two and the 19 listed from the Basque ranges of Spain, circa 500-700 C.E., that therefore no R1b haplotypes existed in Europe during the intervening centuries. But we all know that to be rediculous. I don't know who created that chart nor for what purpose, but on that same website I find this article, Celtic Tribes of the British Isles in which the R1b haplotype among the Celtic tribes of Britain go back ago back at least to 2,400 BC.
http://www.buildinghistory.org/
distantpast/celtictribes.shtml
Further, here is a link to a European Genetics and Anthropology Blog article which makes the claim that some Italian scientists report that European haplogroup R1b is Paleolithic.
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2010/05/y-
dna-haplogroup-r1b-in-europe-is_02.html
While neither do I know whose blog that is nor whether the blogger has a particular point of view to attempt to "prove," it does help to show that choosing one's evidence to fit the conclusions already drawn, whether by yourself or possibly by this blogger either one is foolish and ultimately destructive to one's credibility in the long run.
Henry Rhea
Pleased with what you read'
Click Here to make an offering. |
PREVIOUS ISSUES |
|
|