At last! Ireland has passed the Lisbon treaty and now the European Union can
move forward with its plan for world domination. Within months, the EU is likely
to appoint a president and a foreign minister. Tony Blair is limbering up for a
run at the top job. A clutch of Swedish, Dutch and Belgian candidates are
jostling for the post of foreign minister.
Fortified by its new foreign-policy structures, the Union is staking a claim to
be taken seriously as a global superpower. David Miliband, Britain's foreign
secretary, says: "It shouldn't be a G2 of the US and China. There should be a G3
with the European Union."
But what happens in Brussels - or even in trilateral dealings between the US,
China and Europe - is a sideshow. The real key to Europe's global ambitions is
the Group of 20.
The Europeans did not just set the tone at the G20 - they also dominate
proceedings, since they are grossly over-represented. Huge countries such as
Brazil, China, India and the US are represented by one leader each. The
Europeans managed to secure eight slots around the conference table for Britain,
France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, the president of the European
Commission and the president of the European Council. Most of the key
international civil servants present were also Europeans: Dominique
Strauss-Kahn, head of the International Monetary Fund; Pascal Lamy of the World
Trade Organisation; Mario Draghi of the Financial Stability Board.
As a result, the Europeans seemed much more tuned into what was going on than
some of the other delegations. Puzzling over the new powers given to the IMF to
monitor national economic policies in the Pittsburgh conclusions, I was
interrupted by an old friend from the European Commission, who recognised the
language immediately. "Ah yes," she said, "the open method of co-ordination."
But does any of this really matter? After all, EU summits and statements have
become a byword for tortuous and ineffective machinations that often have little
real-world effect. The process that gave birth to the Lisbon treaty started
eight years ago. Even after Ireland's Yes vote, Lisbon could still be derailed
by recalcitrant governments in the Czech Republic or Britain.
However, the saga of Lisbon can be read another way. Once the EU gets its teeth
into an issue, it never really lets go. Processes started at EU summits - which
often seem minor bits of bureaucratic paper-shuffling - often turn out to have
important political implications, years later. The same could well be true of
some of the decisions made in Pittsburgh - such as the language on tax havens
and bankers' bonuses.
Of course, there is still a huge gap between the capabilities of the modern EU
and those of the G20. There is no army of G20 civil servants to match the
bureaucrats of Brussels. There is no body of G20 law and no G20 court to enforce
the group's decisions. Nor is there much immediate prospect that the US or China
- both countries that zealously guard their sovereignty - will cede any serious
powers to a G20 law-making body.
Yet the kernel of something new has been created. To understand its potential,
it is worth going back to the Schuman Declaration of 1950, which started the
process of European integration. "Europe," it said, "will not be made all at
once, or according to a single plan. It will be built through concrete
achievements, which first create a de facto solidarity."
The G20 now has some achievements and a burgeoning sense of solidarity between
the members of this new, most exclusive, club. Who knows what comes next?
2. Mahatma Gandhi Enemy of Israelites:
anti-Jewish and pro-Nazi, idealized by Obama
(a) Introduction
Mahatma Gandhi idol of left-wingers was an enemy of Israelites everywhere:
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (1944-1948).
Gandhi learnt law in Britain. Moved to South Africa where he campaigned for the
rights of local Indians though he was against granting the same to Blacks.
He is known for advocating non-violence and civil disobedience though there were
times when he condoned and even praised violence such as that later employed
against Indian Muslims.
He helped lead the campaign for the Indepdence of India from the British.
He is now considered a hero in India and an idol of left-wing socialist New Age
types.
(1) Wikipedia
Extracts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi
Extracts:
World War II broke out in 1939 when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. Initially,
Gandhi had favoured offering "non-violent moral support" to the British effort,
but other Congressional leaders were offended by the unilateral inclusion of
India into the war, without consultation of the people's representatives. All
Congressmen elected to resign from office en masse.[26] After lengthy
deliberations, Gandhi declared that India could not be party to a war ostensibly
being fought for democratic freedom, while that freedom was denied to India
itself. As the war progressed, Gandhi intensified his demand for independence,
drafting a resolution calling for the British to Quit India. This was Gandhi's
and the Congress Party's most definitive revolt aimed at securing the British
exit from Indian shores.[27]
...Although the Quit India movement had moderate success in its objective, the
ruthless suppression of the movement brought order to India by the end of 1943.
At the end of the war, the British gave clear indications that power would be
transferred to Indian hands. At this point Gandhi called off the struggle, and
around 100,000 political prisoners were released, including the Congress's
leadership.
In accordance with these views, in 1940, when invasion of the British Isles by
Nazi Germany looked imminent, Gandhi offered the following advice to the British
people (Non-Violence in Peace and War):[40]
"I would like you to lay down the arms you have as being useless for saving you
or humanity. You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor Mussolini to take what they
want of the countries you call your possessions...If these gentlemen choose to
occupy your homes, you will vacate them. If they do not give you free passage
out, you will allow yourselves, man, woman, and child, to be slaughtered, but
you will refuse to owe allegiance to them."
In a post-war interview in 1946, he offered a view at an even further extreme:
"Hitler," Gandhi said, "killed five million Jews. It is the greatest crime of
our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher?s knife.
They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs? It would have
aroused the world and the people of Germany? As it is they succumbed anyway in
their millions."[41]
Gandhi influenced important leaders and political movements. Leaders of the
civil rights movement in the United States, including Martin Luther King and
James Lawson, drew from the writings of Gandhi in the development of their own
theories about non-violence.[61][62][63] Anti-apartheid activist and former
President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, was inspired by Gandhi.[64] Others
include Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan,[65] Steve Biko, Aung San Suu Kyi [66] and
Philippine opposition leader during the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos,
Benigno Aquino, Jr.
In addition, the British musician John Lennon referred to Gandhi when discussing
his views on non-violence.[68] At the Cannes Lions International Advertising
Festival in 2007, former U.S. Vice-President and environmentalist Al Gore spoke
of Gandhi's influence on him.[69]
Finally, prior to becoming President of the United States, then-Senator
Barack
Obamanoted that: Throughout my life, I have always looked to Mahatma Gandhi
as an inspiration, because he embodies the kind of transformational change that
can be made when ordinary people come together to do extraordinary things. That
is why his portrait hangs in my Senate office: to remind me that real results
will come not just from Washington ? they will come from the people.
Obama at the Wakefield High School speech in Sept 2009, said that his biggest
inspiration came from Mahatma Gandhi. It was when a question posed on him as
'who was the one person, dead or live, that he would choose to dine with?' and
his quick reply was 'Gandhi!'. He continued and said that - "He's somebody I
find a lot of inspiration in. He inspired Dr. King with his message of
nonviolence. He ended up doing so much and changed the world just by the power
of his ethics".[71]
Gandhi also expressed his dislike for partition during the late 1930s in
response to the topic of the partition of Palestine to create Israel. He stated
in Harijan on 26 October 1938:
#Several letters have been received by me asking me to declare my views about
the Arab-Jew question in Palestine and persecution of the Jews in Germany. It is
not without hesitation that I venture to offer my views on this very difficult
question. My sympathies are all with the Jews. I have known them intimately in
South Africa. Some of them became life-long companions. Through these friends I
came to learn much of their age-long persecution. They have been the
untouchables of Christianity [...] But my sympathy does not blind me to the
requirements of justice. The cry for the national home for the Jews does not
make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and the
tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after return to Palestine. Why should
they not, like other peoples of the earth, make that country their home where
they are born and where they earn their livelihood? Palestine belongs to the
Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the
French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going
on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct.[86][87]#
Gandhi's statements regarding Jews facing the impending Holocaust have attracted
criticism from a number of commentators.[93] Martin Buber wrote a sharply
critical open letter to Gandhi on 24 February 1939. Buber asserted that the
comparison between British treatment of Indian subjects and Nazi treatment of
Jews was inappropriate; moreover, he noted that when Indians were the victims of
persecution, Gandhi had, on occasion, supported the use of force.[94]
(2) The Gandhi Nobody Knows by Richard
Grenier
http://history.eserver.org/ghandi-nobody-knows.txt Extracts: During his entire South African period, and for some time after,
until he was about fifty, Gandhi was nothing more or less than an imperial
loyalist, claiming for Indians the rights of Englishmen but unshakably loyal to
the crown. He supported the empire ardently in no fewer than three wars: the
Boer War, the "Kaffir War," and, with the most extreme zeal, World War I.
He sang the praises of Subhas Chandra Bose, who, sponsored by first the Nazis
and then the Japanese, organized in Singapore an Indian National Army with which
he hoped to conquer India with Japanese support, establishing a totalitarian
dictatorship.
So, for those who like round numbers, the British killed some 400 seditious
colonials at Amritsar and the name Amritsar lives in infamy, while Indians may
have killed some *4 million* of their own countrymen for no other reason than
that they were of a different religious faith and people think their great
leader would make an inspirational subject for a movie.
I feel all Jews sitting emotionally at the movie 'Gandhi' should be apprised of
the advice that the Mahatma offered their coreligionists when faced with the
Nazi peril: they should commit collective suicide. If only the Jews of Germany
had the good sense to offer their throats willingly to the Nazi butchers' knives
and throw themselves into the sea from cliffs they would arouse world public
opinion, Gandhi was convinced, and their moral triumph would be remembered for
"ages to come." If they would only pray for Hitler (as their throats were cut,
presumably), they would leave a "rich heritage to mankind." ...Even after the
war, when the full extent of the Holocaust was revealed, Gandhi told Louis
Fischer, one of his biographers, that the Jews died anyway, didn't they? They
might as well have died significantly.
he wrote furiously to the Viceroy of India: "This manslaughter must be stopped.
You are losing; if you
persist, it will only result in greater bloodshed. Hitler is not a bad man...." 3. IDF:
'One million [African] refugees headed for Israel' From: imra@netvision.net.il
IDF units responsible for guarding Israel's expansive western border with
Egypt said Thursday that there are one million would-be infiltrators from
Africa waiting to cross the mostly barrier-less border and enter Israel
illegally.
The statements were made to a group of MKs from the Knesset's Committee on
the Issue of Foreign Workers, who traveled to the South to hear an assessment of
the situation from those closest to the problem.
After hearing the briefing by IDF officers, the committee's members called upon
the government to immediately initiate the IDF contingency plan that was
approved by the Olmert administration, known as "Hourglass." The plan includes a
number of steps to be taken to significantly reduce the number of work
immigrants who infiltrate across Israel's expansive southern borders.
Committee Chairman Ya'acov Katz called upon the defense establishment to begin
immediate work on one of the salient features of the proposed project - the
erection of an electronic fence along hundreds of kilometers of isolated
borderlands with Egypt. MKs Shai Hermesh (Kadima), Carmel Shama (Likud) and
Nitzan Horovitz (Meretz) accompanied Katz on the tour. The cost of the fence is
estimated at $1 million per kilometer.
"I salute the residents of the South who are coping with their cities being
flooded by immigrants who endanger the stability of their communities," said
Katz, who included the mayors of Eilat, Arad and other Negev-area cities in his
committee's visit to the Egyptian border and the headquarters of the IDF's Eilat
80th Division, responsible for security along the border.
Eilat Municipality officials estimated that illegal infiltrators now constitute
around seven percent of the city's population.
Katz has said that according to the data he has received, between 600 and 1000
people infiltrate across the desert border each month. But not all residents of
the South are quite so enthusiastic regarding any cuts to the number of foreign
workers in the work force. Even as Katz and his committee toured the Negev,
farmers in the isolated Arava Valley put the finishing touches on their plans to
launch a massive demonstration this coming Sunday to protest cuts to the number
of foreign workers that they can employ on their farms.
The farmers complain that as they are located beyond commuting distance from any
major cities, if they are not allowed to import hundreds of foreign workers -
mostly from Thailand - they will simply not be able to harvest the produce that
makes their farms viable.
--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il
Pleased with what you read?
The Brit-Am enterprise is a Biblical work. God willing, they who assist Brit-Am will be blessed.
Brit-Am depends on contributions alongside purchases of our publications
'It is impossible to rightly govern the
world without God or the Bible.'
George Washington
Brit-Am is the "still small voice" that contains the truth.
[1-Kings 19:12] AND AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE A FIRE; BUT THE LORD WAS NOT IN THE
FIRE: AND AFTER THE FIRE A STILL SMALL VOICE.