"Brit-Am Now"-1013
Contents:
1. Wales, Israelites, Gomer,
and the Jews
2. Harry Gaul: Loved you on Tamar's show
3. Question on a literal understanding of the
Midrash
and Keeping the Commandments
4. Question on the Khazars,
Ancient Israelites, and DNA
5. Finland a Lost Tribe of Israel?
###################################################
|
Contents by Subject |
Home Research Revelation Reconciliation |
Publications |
Site Map Contents in Alphabetical Order |
This Site |
|
Shalom Yair.
Thanks for answering my question regarding Toldos 26:5, but please know my question was not meant to be controversial.
I agree that returning Israelites MAY follow Torah if they want to and it will be a blessing to them! But how is that to be accomplished?
It's taken me a while to return this letter because I realized you misunderstood my question regarding Abraham following Torah by Devine Inspiration.
I ask if the Rabbinical Midrashic- style Exegesis is not to be taken literally, why is it written up in The Stones Edition as a commentary on Toldos 26:5?
What aspects of the Law do you think are relevant for returning Israelites? It's a difficult thing to answer people who ask me.
Kind regards.
Anna.
================================================
Reply:
We were not precise enough with what we said.
A Midrash-Agada (legend) of the type you quoted may be taken literally by some.
Its main point however is the message it conveys.
For example take the commandment of Yibum (Leviritical Marriage) as explained in
Deuteronomy ch.25.
The Commandment is that when a man marries a woman and dies without children
his brother (from the same father) marries his widow or the widow releases him
of his obligation.
The idea is that the woman remain in the family and if possible bear children
through that family.
The principle behind the idea existed before the giving of the Torah.
In Genesis chapter 38 we are told how the son of Judah, Er, married Tamar, and
then passed away.
Tamar was then given to Onan who also died. Judah told Tamar to wait until the
third son, Shelah,
was old enough and he would marry her. Judah however thought that Tamar was bad
luck and did not give
her to Shelah when the time came. Tamar then went and disguised herself as a
harlot, seduced Judah,
and bore him a son.
Nachmanides explains that before the giving of the Torah the principle of Yibum
could be fulfilled by ANY
member of the family and only after the Giving of the Torah was it restricted to
the brother of the deceased.
After the giving of the Torah the obligation falls ONLY on the brother and not
on any other member of the family.
Before the giving of the Torah either Judah or his sons could have fulfilled the
obligation and therefore Tamar
was within her rights by seducing Judah.
In the same way it may be said that A|braham kept all the torah even before the
Torah was given in so far
as he fulfilled the intention of the Torah but not necessarily each and every
commandment as it was later formulated.
As to what commandments a non-Jewish Israelite should keep and how they should
keep them
we cannot say. Keeping Kosher food laws or at least not eating forbidden foods
could be a beginning.
In the US a lot of people now eat Kosher for health reasons.
At all events this beyond our jurisdiction.
God bless you
Yair Davidiy
###################################################
4. Question on the
Khazars,
Ancient Israelites, and DNA
Jan wrote:
Dear Sir:
If you look at the Internet, there are a lot of malicious bloggers claiming that Ashkenazim are a mixture with Khazars. However, it is not difficult to find the DNA of modern Ashkenazim and compare it to the DNA of ancient Israelites...
What are your views on this matter?
Jan
================================================
Reply:
DNA of Ancient Peoples is a difficult topic.
We are looking for articles on this subject all the time and finding very few.
It is controversial.
Apparently it is very difficult to extract and also considered not reliable.
Whatever the case if you come across any sources on the subject please let us
know.
See what we have written concerning DNA on our web-site.
http://www.britam.org/DNA/DNAContents.html
We actually believe that DNA can and does change in "one-time events"
repeated over.
DNA scholars however disagree with us on this issue and that is why (I assume)
we are barred from their discussion groups.
Nevertheless from the little that has been published we can guess that Ancient
DNA findings bear out Brit-Am more than is admitted.
Getting back to DNA and Ashkenazim according to conventional science.
The Ashkenazim on the whole (at least the males) have similar DNA to the
Sephardim (Eastern Jews).
What the DNA of the Khazars was nobody knows.
About 20% of Ashkenazim have YDNA R1a which is found in 30% of Norwegians, many
Russians, and Poles.
It may be that the 20% of Ashkenazim who have YDNA R1a descend from East
Europeans or it may be that
their ancestors were exposed to the same environmental circumstances that gives
rise to R1a.
DNA is in effect another name for Genes. Genes determine hair color etc and this
ultimately is a result of environment
so therefore the DNA must be as well.
At all events DNA findings may indicate (depending on how they are interpreted)
that Ashkenazis have some
foreign genetical input but this does not apply to most of them and neither does
it mean that the source is due to
the Khazars.
Apart from all that the Khazars were a people that if one were descended from
them one should be proud of it.
See our articles on the subject:
http://www.britam.org/KhazarIndex.html
Concerning Ancient DNA cf. the following URL which was the fourth answer
received from a Google Search on Ancient DNA:
"Ancient DNA may be misleading scientists"
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s786146.htm
Ancient DNA in skeletons has a tendency to show damage in a particular
region, resulting in misleading genetic data and mistaken conclusions about the
origin of the skeleton, British scientists said.
A group of researchers at the Henry Wellcome Ancient Biomolecules Centre of the
University of Oxford, in Britain, made the finding while studying Viking
specimens. They found that about half of the specimens had DNA that suggested
they were of Middle Eastern origin.
But more detailed analysis revealed that many of the genetic sequences in the
double helix molecule, which carries the genetic information of every
individual, were damaged at a key base that separates European sequences from
Middle Eastern genetic types - damage which made the skeletons appear to have
originated in the Levant.
The results are published in the February 2003 issue of the American Journal of
Human Genetics.
###################################################
5. Finland a Lost
Tribe of Israel?
From: Ope Tuslapsi
Subject: Awareness of Finns being the tribe of Issachar rises
This link tells It quite good.
The Identity of Finland
by
Rainer Salomaa & Allan Reipas
http://www.giveshare.org/israel/finland.html
Brit-Am Comment: The site has an interesting array of articles containing
information of value.
The first article contains the statement:
"It?s interesting to not that during this war General Mannerheim,
commander-in-chief of the Finnish forces between 1939 and 1944, led a Finnish
attack against the Russians under the banner of the tribe of Issachar! "
We have heard this or similar statements before and have repeated it
but see the protest of a Finnish citizen who claims that it is not so:
"Brit-Am Now"-767
http://britam.org/now/767Now.html
#3. Marshall Mannerheim Never Referred to Issachar?
See also the quote from Stanley Olson (also used by us in "The Tribes" but we
got it from S. Gustav Olsen):
Yet another race ? a mixture of Scythians, Greeks and Hebrews, bearing the name
Neuri joined themselves to both of the two previously mentioned races. Thus from
three peoples they became like one, who moved toward the west to our Finnish and
Swedish belts of rock off the coast. In regard to the Neuri, who actually are
the very tribe in the direction of the Finns, Lapps and Estonians, it should be
noted that they are found to be remnants of THE TEN FAMILIES OF ISRAEL, who
Salmanasser, the King of Assyria, took captive from Canaan. After one and a half
year?s traveling, they moved to a land where no man had yet dwelt, called
Arfareth and corresponds to the Scythians? Arfaratha. When one finds how much
the languages of the old Finns, Lapps and Estonians agree with the Hebrew, plus
the fact that this people anciently figured the beginning of the year from the
first of March and figured Saturday as their Sabbath, one also sees that the
Nueri in all probability have had this origin? (Dalin, Sven-rikes Historia,
Volume I, pp. 49-55, emphasis mine). Interesting words!
AND IN THEE SHALL ALL FAMILIES OF THE EARTH BE BLESSED [Genesis
12:2-3].
__________ NOD32 2654 (20071113) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com