|
Brit-Am Discussion Group 
|
Contents by Subject |
Research Revelation Reconciliation |
Site Map Contents in Alphabetical Order |
 This Site |
||
Brit-Am Replies:
First of all Niemala and his ilk would have the effrontery to link Yair Davidiy
with the non-existent "Dr. Ben Freedman" whose existence was invented by some very sick people.
Secondly we never used the term "Turko-Finn" anywhere as far as I know.
We never linked the Finns and Turks together but Niemala does.
We did gain the impression that some of the Khazars spoke a Finnish dialect and
were probably historically connected with them.
Non-Israelites of partial Finnish origin who feel (as Niemala evidently does)
offended by such an association should feel at ease.
We doubt if such types have any Khazar blood in them since the Khazars on the
whole were far nicer and more positive people than they are.
Niemala has the following sentence:
================================================
<<In Finland we saw one of these miracles by a people militarily led by the Last
Knight of Europe as Field Marshall Mannerheim was called. On occasion while
addressing his troops in the field, he would exhort them as follows..
"Sons of Issachar, stand and die, but let only scorched earth fall into the
hands of the antichrists".
================================================
Brit-Am Replies:
In our own writings on Finland we also quoted Field Marshall Mannerheim as
identifying the Finns with Issachar because we had seen it written elsewhere. When challenged by a Finnish citizen
for a reliable source however we could not find one.
We may eventually do so.
The Field Marshall was pro-Jewish and the belief that
the Finns were descended from the Lost Tribes existed in Finland from the beginning of recorded history (which was however
quite late).
On the other hand it may turn out to have been yet another misleading piece of
fabricated evidence.
British Israel and identity literature in general can sometimes provide valuable leads
especially since they, like everybody else, borrow from the research of others. On the other hand we have
learned to our sorrow that such sources are not to be relied upon without verification elsewhere.
Getting back to "Niemela"
He sent us the following missive:
================================================
At 11:13 PM 12/17/2007, "Richard Niemela" <ricniemela@earthlink.net> wrote:
In Steven Collins article, I see that he purposely refuses to point out a Fact of History, that Sennacherib, took MOST of Judah (54 Fenced Cities) on the third raid into the region of the Tribes...James 1:1 confirms this point..>And most of Christian Israel consider the Germans to be the remnant of that captivity of Judah
....There ain''t no Khazars that qualify either..>JRN
================================================
To which we replied:
People who hold such beliefs are not Israelites but because of such people (as yourself) most of the Mainstream do not want to hear about the Lost Tribes.
You have polluted the source.
We then received the following:
================================================
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:03:17 -0500
From: Richard Niemela <ricniemela@earthlink.net>
<<Subject: Re: THE ISRAELITE ORIGIN OF THE SCYTHIANS-2
<<People such as yourself! Well, If I was an ashkenazic Khazar I would hang my
head...Ashkenaz was Not semetic, but the grandson of Japheth...Do you ever tell
your people this fact? No, and jews go around thinking that they are semetic...Hardly...
<<II KINGS 18:13...Read it again for the TRuth about who was left to be
reconstituted into an ersatz Judah...even the Bible begins calling these people
the "inhabitants" or the "residue" of Judah...
<<130 Years later they too went into their own captivity from which they
returned 70 years later as the 70 week nation of Jews, a Jewish nation ordained
or chartered to last exactly that long.>Daniel 9 speaks to this point and proves
who is who...JRN
================================================
Brit-Am Replies:
In reply we would say that the Bible is our standard and the Bible throughout
refers to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and Judah (i.e. the Jews) as just that, as "Judah".
No other explanation is possible.
http://www.britam.org/judah.html
We have in our own writings, (e.g. in our books, such as "The Tribes" and in several articles such as, "The Completeness of the Exile") emphasized the fact that
many of Judah were exiled with the Ten Tribes BUT we have also pointed out that in Scripture they are included
with them and are not counted as a separate entity.
Nachmanides writes about this:
http://www.britam.org/Nachmanides.html
The term "Judah" always refers to those who remained behind, were later
exiled, and returned in part under Ezra and Nehemiah.
We would not normally reply to scum such as Niemela but the present example is
an exception.
We hope shortly to begin publishing several articles on the Khazars followed by
a book.
This will show that the Khazars are of Israelite descent and ALSO confirm
Brit-Am findings concerning the Israelite origins of Western Peoples as explained in our previous
publications.
Anyone who is liable to be offended or whatnot should know in advance that is
what we are about to do.
We already have some articles on the Khazars on our site:
http://www.britam.org/KhazarIndex.html
We also have "Ephraimite Criteria" in which we have stated that anti-Jewish sentiments indicate non-Israelite origin.
http://www.britam.org/criteria.html
This does not mean that anyone who is an anti-Semite is of necessity of
non-Israelite origin.
There are Jewish anti-Semites as well and Isaiah indicated that tension between
Ephraim and Judah would endure until the end times,
see:
Isaiah 11:13
http://britam.org/isaiah/chap-eleven.html
Nevertheless hatred of the Jews is an indication of non-Israelite origins.
What is more it is an offence against the Almighty for which the offender will
be punished as may be seen throughout the Bible.
See the Brit-Am Commentary to Psalms, e.g.
http://britam.org/psalms/Psalms-Index.html
Psalms 4:1 6:5 9:13 18:37 etc, etc.
###################################################
3. Michelle: "reason for not doing all
the oral law"
Subject: Re: "Brit-Am Now"-1038
#3. What Do Ephraimites mean when they say they keep the Law?
Yair,
I can only answer why I was upset at the declaration. My opinion is that we need
to become closer to Yah not the Pope. If you will notice Yair, as I have learned
just this week from a Jewish Messianic friend that the Messianic Jews aka MJAA
and UNJC have been working, stealthily I may add (many of their congregants are
completely in the dark about this) to bring itself underneath the Roman Catholic
Church through the Towards Jerusalem Council II trying to reconcile with the
'Mother Church'. The movement that has opened gentiles eyes to the truth of
Torah and the Almighty's commands vs. Rome's commands is now disintegrating into
the church. We need to go under Yah, His commands the King of the Universe's and
not men. Men tend to go where they seek the favor of other men rather than G-d.
We either go to You and Yah or Rome. Rome's arms are wide open and you send us
away, where shall we go if not home?
The reason for not doing all the oral law is because some of it is interpreted
wrong by the opinions of the gentile mindset like milk and meat for Kosher. Some
separate not to offend the brothers but others ask why when Abraham clearly
served milk, butter and calf to the men(angels) that came to visit them. There
are plenty of other places where G-d clearly says don't do this and it meant
that. He used the words for milk and meat in other places and never said don't
mix milk and meat. He said don't boil a kid [goat] in it's mother's milk and it
means that. It does not set a precedent to all milks and meats. That is the
fence created by the Rabbis around the torah to protect breaking it. Some say
that this was commanded to avoid a common pagan ceremony of the day.
I personally do not believe all oral torah is wrong like kosher slaughtered
meat. We don't know how to do it when the written torah says to slaughter
properly, one can only find that information in the oral law. The Almighty has
shown me personally though a personal trial and months of study that kosher
slaughtered meat is free of bacteria and fungi and blood etc... and I and my
family only eat kosher slaughtered meat with a heksher [Approval of Kashrut] and
teach others gentiles/Ephraimites to do the same.
Michelle
================================================
Note: For an article explaining
the Biblical Origins of the Prohibition against mixing
Milk and Meat see:
http://britam.org/Questions/QuesJudaism.html#Bible
and scroll down a little to Question 3 and then to
"Milk and Meat"
| PREVIOUS ISSUES |
