"Brit-Am Now"- 500

Jan 5, 2005
Contents:
1. Question on Isaiah 27:13
2. Questions on Cyrus, Good Gentiles, Talmud, Edom, Joseph, etc
3. The Concealment
4. Early British Contacts with Carthage
5. Athol Bloomer: Spanish Marrano Black Irish
6. Question on Holland, Bermuda, Bahamas, and Trinidad
7. Quotes from Winston Churchill

1. Question on Isaiah 27:13
>From: 600000sch <sch@600000men.com>
>Subject: haovdim b'eretz ashur
>
>Shalom,
>In the haftara [Portion from the Prophets read in the Synagogue] from
>Yishayahu that Ashkenazim [European- Jews] recited last shabbat,
>parshat [Weekly Portion] shmot [Exodus]
>there is a prophecy of the return of haovdim b'eretz ashur [Those who
were
>lost in the Land of Assyria] to the land of
>Israel.
>1 How do you understand the word Ashur?
>2 The word haovdim [Those who were lost] which is in the present tense
>seemingly implies that
>immediately before those exiles of Israel come to Israel, they would
>continue to be reside in Ashur.
>What is your explanation?
>Best wishes
>Shlomo Scheinman

Answer:
"Ashur" means "Assyria".
You are referring to Isaiah 27:13.
"AND IT SHALL COME TO PASS IN THAT DAY, THAT THE GREAT TRUMPET SHALL BE
BLOWN, AND THEY SHALL COME WHICH WERE READY TO PERISH (Hebrew:
"Ha-Ovdim"
also translatable as "they who were lost") IN THE LAND OF ASSYRIA (i.e.
LTTs), AND THE OUTCASTS (i.e. Jewish Captives) IN THE LAND OF EGYPT,
AND
SHALL WORSHIP THE LORD IN THE HOLY MOUNT AT JERUSALEM" [Isaiah 27:13].
The verse refers to those who were "lost" (or exiled) to Assyria
meaning
the Lost Ten Tribes and also to those who were outcast to the land of
Egypt
usually taken as referring to the Jews of Judah.
Just as the Jews of Judah in the Last days will no longer be Outcasts
in
Egypt but rather scattered throughout the Diaspora so too will the Ten
Tribes not necessarily
still be in Assyria but rather in other countries that they reached as
a
result of the Assyrian exile. As far as I know NO commentator ever said
that they would remain
in Assyria though one (Chochmat Shlomo) seemed to imply that Assyria
meant
the "cities of Ashkenaz" meaning in his terms those of Germany.

Apart from that we have verses that indicate other places ,e.g.
[Isaiah 11:11] IN THAT DAY THE LORD WILL EXTEND HIS HAND YET A SECOND
TIME
TO RECOVER THE REMNANT WHICH IS LEFT OF HIS PEOPLE, FROM ASSYRIA, FROM
EGYPT, FROM PATHROS, FROM ETHIOPIA, FROM ELAM, FROM SHINAR, FROM
HAMATH,
AND FROM THE COASTLANDS OF THE SEA.
In addition to the above we have Obadiah 1:20 that according to Rashi
places the Lost Ten Tribes in France
and according to the Abarbanel in both France and England and other
similar
opinions. See our commentary on these and similar passages.
Also the Talmud and Midrashim mentioned other centers of Exile such as
the
River Sambation, the Mountains of Darkness, etc
We have explained these terms and shown that in Jewish traditions of
the
time they were identifiable with definite places.
None of the said places were in "Assyria".
In some cases these places are regions from which the Lost Ten Tribes
will
return in the End Times
and in other instances they are areas to which the Lost Tribes were
taken
before moving on to elsewhere.
In each case one must take account of the context and the simple
meaning of
the Hebrew passages.
[All the sources to this answer plus additional explanations are to be
found in our book "Ephraim" ]

   [Isaiah 60:8] WHO ARE THESE THAT FLY AS A CLOUD, AND AS THE DOVES TO
THEIR WINDOWS?
The Lost Tribes and Judah will return in aeroplanes flying as a cloud
like
pigeons homing in on their homeland.
  [Isaiah 60:9] SURELY THE ISLES SHALL WAIT FOR ME, AND THE SHIPS OF
TARSHISH FIRST, TO BRING THY SONS FROM FAR, THEIR SILVER AND THEIR GOLD
WITH THEM, UNTO THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD, AND TO THE HOLY ONE OF
ISRAEL, BECAUSE HE HATH GLORIFIED THEE.
The ships of  Tarshish  are ships plying the Atlantic Ocean such as
those
of North America who will bring the Exiles back.

"Tarshish" can refer to the Atlantic Ocean area and to the USA as
explained
in "The Tribes". Historically Tarshish was centered in Spain with
colonies
in Gaul and Britain. It was just past the Straits of Gibraltar and so
the
name (in Biblical exegesis) came to represent the whole Atlantic Ocean
area
and in a future sense North America.
An article from Gunnar Jeremia Gishron of Jerusalem (in our magazine
"BRIT-AM")
traces the dollar sign to a coin issued by a Swedish monarch. The
original
coin included  the name of God in Hebrew and the motto in Swedish "In
God
WE Trust"!
Later the Spanish adapted the coin and the USA took it from the
Spanish.
The Spanish version bore the Heraldric sign of the Spanish Royal
family.
This represented the two pillars of Hercules at Gibraltar, i.e. of
Tarshish. These pillars gave rise to the dollar "$" symbol (with two
strokes not one)! The ancient northern Israelites (LTTS) wrote Hebrew
interspersed with Egyptian-like hieroglyphics. Where we to use the
hieroglyphic system today instead of writing "AMERICA" or the USA all
the
time we would substitute "$" as a hieroglyph representing the USA. This
one
sign ($) could only in the context stand for the USA. This is the sign
of
Gibraltar, i.e. the sign of Tarshish. Isaiah (60:9) says that ships of
Tarshish will be the leaders in returning the exiles.

2. Questions on Cyrus, Good Gentiles, Talmud, Edom, Joseph, etc
From: Shlomo Scheinman
600000sch <sch@600000men.com>
>Shalom,
>a.
>I have a further proof that your Cyrus theory is not correct.
>See Rashi to Genesis 9:27 who says outright that Cyrus was descended
from
>Yefet and not from the lineage of the ten tribes or even from Shem.
>b.
>Furthermore the fact that certain gentile nations are hostile or
friendly to
>us is no proof of their origin.
>The daughter of Pharaoh who saved Moses was friendly to us, but
definitely
>an Egyptian and not of Israel descent.
>The ten tribes on the other hand for example, during the time of
yeravom in
>the tanakh launched a civil war against those of Judah.
>Or today leftist Jews who are clearly of Jewish descent severely
threaten
>the rest of the Jewish people.
c.
>The Talmud in tractate yevamot 16b seemed to imply that even in the
time of
>the Talmud much of the ten tribes could still be found in the place
that
>they were exiled to by Ashur-Assyria and the Talmud struggled with 2
>different explanations to explain if one of those people married a Jew
why
>wouldn't the marriage hold legal validity lchumra, see there for
details.
d.
In any case England in my line of thinking should be view as an Edomite
>country.
>One because of its Christianity. [see (Commentary of) malbim to
ovadia]
>and two because the
>midrash compares Edom to the chazir [swine] and in kohelet rabba
chapter 1
>it is
>explained that it is called chazir because in the future it will
restore
>="lehachazir" [i.e. the word for  "swine" or "boar" has the same root
as the
word for "return" or "restore] the greatness and the kingdom to its
owner.
>England took Palestine away from the ottoman empire and gave it to the
Jews
>in the balfour declaration. This is my understanding a fulfillment or
>partial fulfillment of that midrash concerning Edom. So too Harry
Truman a
>Cyrus-type leader over a Christian edomite country who played a key
role in
>getting the United Nations to support the creation of the state of
Israel
>Rabbeinu Bachiya on leviticus/vayikra chapter 11 felt that Edom would
in the
>future help us rebuild the third Temple and that the forces in the
past that
>were harmful to us would return together with other forces to help and
>support Israel...
e. Kol Hator explains that a smaller degree of the salvations that we
will see
>in the full redemption we will see already in the beginning stages of
the
>redemption.
>The salvations come in ever increasing stages and intensity because it
is
>like a man living in the dark that you want to reintroduce to the
world of
>light.
>If the light is too fast and intense it will blind or hurt the eyes of
the
>person used to the dark.
>By letting the eyes first see dim light that gets stronger and
stronger, you
>give the eyes the ability to adjust to bright light without harm.
>best wishes
>shlomo scheinman

Answers:
a.  Cyrus belonged to the Pasar-gadae clan whose name MAY mean "Sons of
Gad".
This is a historic possibility that is either correct or not. We do not
build on it.
It may be incorrect. Rashi does not necessarily have to be taken
literally
in the above case.
Rashi was a great commentator and everything he said should be treated
with
respect
and even he does not have to be accepted unquestionably. Other
commentators
(including his own grandchildren
the "Tosafot") frequently disagreed with Rashi.
At all events one way or the other it does not make much difference to
us.

b. True. having Friendly feelings towards the Jewish people does not
mean
that someone is of Jewish descent
and antagonism towards Jews does not preclude the 'antagonist" from
being
Jewish or Israelite themselves.
Nevertheless such feelings are legitimate indications and deserve to be
considered in conjunction with
ADDITIONAL evidence.
see 2-Chronicles 28 where even when fighting against each other
"Israel"
was expected to remember its brotherly connection to "Judah"
and act accordingly. In the future there will be a reconciliation:
[Isaiah 11:13] THE JEALOUSY OF EPHRAIM SHALL DEPART, AND THOSE WHO
HARASS
JUDAH SHALL BE CUT OFF; EPHRAIM SHALL NOT BE JEALOUS OF JUDAH, AND
JUDAH
SHALL NOT HARASS EPHRAIM.


c. If you read the Talmudic passage carefully you will see that they
are
speaking of a few select
regions in which remnants of the Lost Ten Tribes may have been present.
Historically some of the regions mentioned (e.g. Hadayb -Adiabene,
Moskhi,
Hidki, Cities of the Medes) were at the time
Sakai-Scythian centers and this actually strengthens our historical
conclusions.
Also the time of the discussion was around 400-500 CE and ethnic
changes in
the area were still taking place.
The Talmud is definitely speaking of minorities in the said area and
the
Talmud itself is not certain of their identity
and that is why the discussion takes place.

d. Esau the brother of Jacob was symbolized by a wild boar or "chazir"
which also means "swine" or "pig".
Descendants of Esau in the Babylonian and Roman forces were
traditionally
responsible for destroying
both the First and Second Temples:
"THE BOAR OUT OF THE WOOD DOTH WASTE IT" [Psalms 80:13]
  A boar was a frequently used symbol  amongst Germanic and Celtic
peoples
and elements from Esau (in addition to israelite ones) had settled
amongst
these groups
as explained in our books "The Tribes" and especially "Ephraim".
In Jewish tradition Roman Christianity was identified with Edom (Esau)
since
the founders of Rome were said to be descended from Esau and European
civilization ingeneral
had characteristics of Edom.
<<There are seventy faces (aspects) to the Torah>>.
One explanation does not necessarily nullify another one.
Accepting the source you quoted as correct [something that we are not
necessarily obliged to do] then:
It may be that the Christians (represented symbolically by "Edom")
will  help the Jews return to their land and
rebuild the Temple.
It may also be that these same Christians (spiritually represented by
Edom)
will be the physical descendants of Joseph.
It may ALSO be said that a consistent comprehensive understanding of
ALL
the relevant sources would say
that JOSEPH was to take the Land from Edom (the Turks in  Palestine
being
directed by German instructors and officers?) and persuade the rest  of
Edom (in the League of Nations) to return the Land to the Jews.
Technically
Britain received "Palestine" as a "Mandate" (commission to administer)
from the League of Nations in which to create a Jewish Home.
It was the League of Nations (forerunner of the UN) representing all
the
Gentiles but especially Edom who turned the
Land over to Britain to fulfill the role of  Joseph on behalf of Judah.
Later it was a majority of the UNited Nations that recognized the State
of
Israel.

In other words:
Before the First World War "Palestine" was ruled by the Turks. The
Turks
were allied to the Germans and Austro-Hungarians.
The Turks in Palestine were directed by German generals and instructors
and
Turkish troops in the Artillery Corps
and other units were commanded by German officers.
The British and Anzacs (Australians and New Zealanders) conquered
Palestine
from the Turks and Germans.
The League of Nations (forerunner of the UN) was set up and at that
time
represented mainly Christian nations since
most other peoples were ruled or controlled by the "Colonial" powers.
These Christian nations in the league of nations empowered Britain to
rule
Palestine in accordance to the Balfour declaration
that called for the establishment in Palestine of a Jewish homeland.

Other Jewish traditions (that you most certainly should be aware of)
say
that Joseph and the Lost Ten Tribes
and the Messiah son of Joseph will help the Jews return to their land
and
rebuild the Temple and then later return themselves.
It also says  that Edom only falls at the hands of Joseph.
It also indicates (Megilla 6) that "Edom" is Germany and Rome.
Brit-Am EMPHASIZES these traditions concerning Joseph and the Lost Ten
Tribes because they are the ones most consistent
with the literal meaning of Scripture and historical reality.

In Brit-Am terminology "Joseph" (Britain and co) conquered the Land of
Israel (Palestine) from Edom (Turkey and Germany).
Later the rest of Edom (Christian nations in general) confirmed the
rule of
Joseph over the land of Canaan
it being understand that Joseph would enable the return of Judah (the
Jews)
to the land of Canaan.
despite everything Joseph did help Judah lay the foundations of a
Jewish
State. Along came WW2
in which Rome and Germany [Edom] were defeated by Britain and America
[Joseph] and Russia.
The Jewish State came into being and American pressure assured its
acceptance by a majority of
nations in the UN.
Joseph forced Edom and the Gentiles to accept the independent existence
of
Judah.
Joseph (the USA) still fulfills this role and to the degree that it
continues to do so it is true to its real self.

The Brit-Am explanation is the ONLY ONE that brings ALL the sources
together and explains them as a consistent
comprehensive whole that is ALSO in tune with our day to day reality.
If you do not accept the Brit-Am explanation then it must be that you
are
rejecting very important
segments of Rabbinical tradition.
If you wish to reject such traditions or portions of them say so
straight out
and we will speak accordingly. You cannot however, in my opinion, quote
such traditions and then
not accept what they say. If you do not accept the Brit-Am explanation
you
have a problem with your own
world outlook.

e. The book "Kol Hator" is based on sayings attributed to Elyahu of
Vilna.
In our book "Joseph" a whole chapter is dedicated to the book  "Kol
Hator"
since the sayings quoted are consistent with the Brit-Am interpretation
and
strengthen it.
We have expanded on this issue in our Hebrew work, "Achim Acharim"
which
may be purchased
for $10 or read for free on our website.

3. The Concealment.
Extract adapted from "Ephraim" chapter four  followed by Brit-Am
Comment:
<< "THAT THOU MAY SAYEST...TO THEM THAT ARE IN DARKNESS, SHEW
YOURSELVES"
(ISAIAH 49:9):

             REFERRING SAYS THE MIDRASH (Numbers Rabah 1;6, Eichah
Rabah
2;9, Jerusalemi Sanhedrin ch.17, L.6,29) TO THOSE OF THE LOST TRIBES
WHOM
THE CLOUD CAME DOWN UPON AND COVERED. Another Midrash (Numbers Rabah
17;16)
says that part of the exiled Israelites went to the "Mountains of
Darkness"
which is a related concept.
Now from those places to which the Lost Ten Tribes were exiled there
emerged the Cimmerians, Scythians, and Gothic ethnic groups. These
peoples
were either mainly Israelite or that at least Israelites were a
significant
element amongst them and that the bulk of Israelite exiles were to be
found
in their midst.
Like the third part of exiled Israelites in the Midrash, so too, were
the
Cimmerians in Classical Literature to be associated with Clouds,
Mountains,
or simply regions, of Darkness. A word root " comer" (reminiscent of
"Cimmerian") in both Hebrew and Latin even connotes "darkness"!
The bulk of the Cimmerians via the Balkans entered Europe and moved
westward. They are identified in general with the Celts. The name
"Celt"
has been interpreted as:
<<Meaning 'hidden' the word  which gives us the Irish form `ceilt',
i.e.
concealment or secret, and the word which gives us the English word
'kilt'. >>
PETER BERRESFORD ELLIS, "The Celtic Empire," London, 1990, p.9.

             The Scottii who from Scythia reached Ireland and from
there
went to Scotland were counted as Celts. Their name ("Scotoi") in Greek
was
also understandable as meaning obscure or hidden. In Britain and
Brittany
(Gaul) lived a people called Ostrynimians by the Carthaginians and
Phoenicians and this name also is said to mean hidden20 from the Hebrew
root "sater". The god Saturn who allegedly reigned in the British Isles
too
has a name derivable in Hebrew from the same root ("sater") and
connoting
the "hidden god". Pagan writers identified Saturn [the hidden one] with
Israel. A portion of the Lost Tribes was understood to be hidden by the
Clouds of Darkness. We find indeed amongst the Celts (especially those
of
Britain) terminology that relates them to the associated concepts of
"hidden", "clouds", and "darkness". This could be dismissed as
coincidental
were it not for the fact that too numerous other proofs from all fields
point in the same direction.
             The Orphic Argonautica (supposed ca.500 BCE) placed the
Cimmerians far away in the north somewhere in the British Isles:
             "Cimmerii who were hidden from the sun rising by the
mountains
of Ripaeus in Britain near the vicinity of Hades..."
               "....far away in the north on the way to the Iernian
[Ireland?] islands.. ".
  Homer (in the "Odyssey" 11;19) mentioned,
"The deep sea of Oceanos [i.e.The Atlantic Ocean] which is the World's
boundary. There is the city of the Cimmerian people. Night is forever
spread over these unhappy mortals".

             Leif Ericson in the 1100s CE visited the coasts of North
America and an effort at colonization was made. A Chronicle of the
event
gave the names Helluland, Markland, and Vinland to the countries
visited.
Whatmore equated "Markland" with North America. After drawing parallels
between the Danish Norwegian word "merke" and the Russian "mrak", he
said
that the name "Markland" (given to North America) signified DARKNESS.>>

In our book "Ephraim" more sources are given and the subject discussed
further.
At all events the Lost Ten Tribes were somehow or other "concealed" and
hidden.

Brit-Am Comment:
There was H.W. Armstrong and his movement and offshoots of it that did
a
lot to spread the "identity" message.
Before that there was J. H. Allen (1902) and Joseph Wild (1882) an
extract
from whose booklet is printed in our
work "Joseph. The Israelite destiny of America". There were others
before
them in Britain, Ireland, Holland, Denmark, Finland.
The idea in various forms appears to go back to  Gildas, King Alfred,
and
the Venerable Bede, to the kingdoms of the Goths and Vandals,
and is also recalled in Jewish Commentary (such as Rashi on Obadiah).
Nevertheless it remained in the province of those
who knew but kept it to themselves or to the eccentric and in our time
also
to the wicked and perverted.

Now, TIMES HAVE CHANGED.
New sources have come to light and the relevance of old sources has
proven
itself.
Brit-Am is part of an unfolding REVELATION.

Until recently the Brit-Am message was concealed.
We are now revealing it but we ourselves are still waking up to its
presence as REALITY.
Many others cannot take it. Something that was there all the time that
could have been seen but was not
is psychologically difficult to accept.
We need to be aware of this phenomenon.
The Jewish conception of the Lost Ten Tribes more or less was that  the
Lost Tribes were Lost Jews
and upon being found would reveal themselves as always having been Jews
or
else would return immediately and enthusiastically to Judaism.
The fact that this is not the case takes some getting used to.
Even if the Brit-Am explanation is accepted by the Jewish people how
exactly the Jews are supposed to relate to "Joseph"
is not yet clear to anyone.
Those who believe in Brit-Am should recognize this conundrum and make
account for it.
Above all you should support Brit-Am however you can.

4. Early British Contacts with Carthage
<<In "Current Archaeology" 139, p. 286, Summer 1994, is a letter from
R.D.
Penhallurick of the Royal Cornwall Museum describing three North
African
coins found in west Cornwall: one from Numidia, dated 200-100 BC, found
c.
1830 at Carn Brea; a very similar one found at Mount Hawke, 4 1/2 miles
from Carn Brea, in 1981; and one from Carthage, c. 300 BC, found in the
Hayle Estuary in 1953.  Whilst these finds in themselves prove little,
and
whilst the author expresses caution about the idea of early contacts
with
the eastern Mediterranean, he does mention the discovery of a Barbary
ape
at Navan [County Meath, near Dublin, Ireland] dated to 200 BC, and also
the
Lough Lene [in West Meath, besides a lake in Central Ireland] boat,
which
was of Mediterranean construction.>>

5. Spanish Marrano Black Irish
From: Athol Bloomer <atholbloomer13@hotmail.com>
Subject: Spanish Marrano Black Irish
Some of the families of the Galway Bay area and other places in Western
Irleand were descended from the Marrano sailors and merchants who were
trading there in the 16th century. You can still see the Spanish Arch
at
Galway Bay. Youghal in Cork had a Jewish Mayor William Annyas
(Anes/Ennis)
of Portuguese Jewish descent in 1555. Some of these families also
settled
in the Ring of Kerry. Later families of this origin often confused
their
origins with the Spanish sailors from the Armada.This made a much more
colourful origin for their 'Spanish' ancestry than from Marrano sailors
and
traders to Galway Bay.

cheers Athol

6. Question on Holland, Bermuda, Bahamas, and Trinidad
>Hello, just wondering if the Europeans and Europeans nations are part
of
>Israel, why is it that:
>
>1. Many European rich people are in behavior and attitude
anti-religous
>and appear to be more interested in risque affairs, wealth, glory, and
>left wing causes than Torah?
>
>2. The Netherlands actually supports drug use, gay marriage, and
actually
>has a vocal movement to legalize pedophilia. It appears that there are
>some black run Carribean nations such as Bermuda, Bahamas, and
Trinidad
>that seem to take a greater interest in bibical morality as we know
it.
>
>I would appreciate any insights.
>Yours truly,
>J

Answer:
Your question took me a bit by surprise.
Concerning the Netherlands, Holland fulfills the criteria that Brit-Am
uses
to determine Israelite
origin and some of the proofs concerning Holland are quite strong, e.g.
a
people known as Sabalingoi
(People of Zebulon) having been in the area and most of the country
being
literally situated "on the shores of the
Sea" (below sea-level and on reclaimed sea land) as it was predicted
for
Zebulon.
[Genesis 49:13] ZEBULUN SHALL DWELL AT THE HAVEN OF THE SEA; AND HE
SHALL
BE FOR AN HAVEN OF SHIPS; AND HIS BORDER SHALL BE UNTO
ZIDON.
"THE HAVEN OF THE SEA" in Hebrew "Chof Yamim" meaning at the seashores
or
at the shore of the seas. I/3 of Holland is below sea-level, another
1/3 is
subject to periodic sea-flooding, i.e. 2/3 of the country is dwelling
on
the shores of the sea. This is the only country in the world where this
holds true. In Ancient Times a people called  "Sabulingoi" dwelt in the
region of Northern Holland. "Sabulingoi" in Hebrew means "People of
Zebulon". Northern peoples at that time switched "s" for "z". Other
groups
in the Netherlands bore Israelite Tribal and clan names and those from
the
Tribe of Zebulon were especially prominent.
see "The Tribes" for more details.
The fact that the people of Holland are now immoral is saddening but a
common Israelite and non-Israelite phenomenon.

Concerning  "Bermuda, Bahamas, and Trinidad",
I knew next to nothing about these countries  before quickly glancing
at a
fact sheet about them on the web.
Bermuda, and the Bahamas recognize the monarch of the UK as Head of
State
whereas Trinidad does not.
Population growth is very low, literacy is high. Income for Bermuda is
one
of the highest in the world
and for Trinidad and Bahamas it is about a third of that of Bermuda but
the
overall quality of life for most
people in these islands is probably reasonable to good, relatively
speaking. AIDS is relatively high and criminal elements may also be
prominent(?).
These places may be considered offshoots of both the USA and UK.
"Anglo"
related blood is not insignificant.

Bahamas Population:
299,697
Ethnic groups:
black 85%, white 12%, Asian and Hispanic 3%

Trinidad and Tobago Population:
1,096,585 (July 2004 est.)
Ethnic groups:
East Indian (a local term - primarily immigrants from northern India)
40.3%, black 39.5%, mixed 18.4%, white 0.6%, Chinese and other 1.2%

Bermuda Population:
64,935 (July 2004 est.)
Ethnic groups:
black 58%, white 36%, other 6%

I would consider these areas part of Israel.
the "Black" and "Indian" elements are the descendants of the Sabaeans
and
people of Cush
referred to by Isaiah.
[Isaiah 11:11] IN THAT DAY THE LORD WILL EXTEND HIS HAND YET A SECOND
TIME
TO RECOVER THE REMNANT WHICH IS LEFT OF HIS PEOPLE, FROM ASSYRIA, FROM
EGYPT, FROM PATHROS, FROM ETHIOPIA [Hebrew: Cush] , FROM ELAM, FROM
SHINAR,
FROM HAMATH, AND FROM THE COASTLANDS OF THE SEA.

  [Isaiah 43:3] FOR I AM THE LORD THY GOD, THE HOLY ONE OF ISRAEL, THY
SAVIOUR: I GAVE EGYPT FOR THY RANSOM, ETHIOPIA [Cush] AND SEBA FOR
THEE.
"ETHIOPIA" in Hebrew "Cush". The term "Cush" could be applied to
Ethiopia
and the Sudan, to all of Africa, to India, or to Central Asia. Here as
e
explained elsewhere we believe the reference is to India.
"ETHIOPIA AND SEBA FOR THEE" in Hebrew the word translated as  "FOR
THEE"
is "tachtecha"  literally "underneath you" also implying subjected to
you.
"Seba" represents the mighty Negro nations that from Saba in the Sudan
branched out at a late date and overran most of Black Africa
intermingling
with, conquering, and/or replacing the previous dark peoples of the
area.
We will see Isaiah predicted that the Lost Tribes would gain possession
of
India and Egypt and transport slaves from Africa. This is what the
British did.

  "THUS SAYS THE LORD, THE LABOR OF EGYPT, AND MERCHANDISE OF ETHIOPIA
[in
Hebrew: "CUSH"], AND OF THE SABAEANS, MEN OF STATURE, SHALL COME OVER
UNTO
YOU, AND THEY SHALL BE YOURS: THEY SHALL COME AFTER YOU; IN CHAINS THEY
SHALL COME OVER, AND THEY SHALL FALL DOWN UNTO YOU, THEY SHALL MAKE
SUPPLICATION UNTO YOU, SAYING, SURELY GOD IS IN YOU; AND THERE IS NO
ELSE,
THERE IS NO OTHER GOD" (Isaiah 45;14).
  According to our understanding of the Prophet Isaiah (43;3 and 45;14
and
the verses around them) it was predicted that the Lost Ten Tribes would
rule over India, Egypt and much of Black Africa. The trade with India
would
be theirs, the recompense arriving (via the Suez Canal) at Egypt would
be
theirs, and they would transport Sabaean Negroes (many of whom were
large-bodied) across the seas in chains. The whole passage ends on the
point that in the Last Days they will return to worship the True God.
In
their own way they had always subconsciously acknowledged the One God
Of
Israel to some degree, but had publicly worshipped something else as
explained at length elsewhere in Ephraim. In the Last days Israel will
then
worship the True God and descendants of those who had been brought over
to
them will also see the truth and bear witness to the God of Israel. We
identify the Lost Ten Tribes headed by Britain and America as Israel.
If we
consider Britain and North America as one "Anglo-Saxon" entity then the
Prophecy indicates that the Lost Ten Tribes are amongst them. The
British
ruled India. Economically they gained very much from trade with India,
they
ruled Egypt and controlled the Suez Canal linking the Mediterranean Sea
with the East. They also controlled much of Africa and African  Slaves
in
chains (THE SABAEANS, MEN OF STATURE) were sent by them and others
acting
on their behalf across the Sea to North America and to the West Indies.
They have an ambivalent attitude towards the God of the Bible but
formally
worship in a way described in Isaiah in the rest of chapter 45.
For more details see our book "Joseph. The Israelite destiny of
America"
and also our commentary to the Book of Isaiah.
Another factor is that a certain proportion of the "Africans" in  
"Bermuda,
Bahamas, and Trinidad"  must have at least partial Israelite ancestry.

7. Quotes from Winston Churchill
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick
themselves
up and hurry off as if nothing has happened." -- Winston Churchill
"It is no use saying, 'We are doing our best.' You have got to succeed
in
doing what is necessary." -- Winston Churchill


Spreading the Brit-Am message is our task.
We do this full time and God willing will continue to do so
as long as necessary.
Your purchases and offerings enable us to work for our peoples.
If possible please send us an offering along with an order for our
publications.
Books offered:
All prices include postage by  air-mail.

Just Printed:
"THE TRIBES. The Israelite Origins of Western Peoples" (3rd edition)
Book is a Classic. ca 592 pages including 48 maps and 44 illustrations.
Vital information in a highly readable text. Special introductory price
only $30.

Also  AVAILABLE :
"Origin. You too are from Israel! You too are the People"
[A Summary of Most of the Major Biblical and Historical Research
Until Now]
"Biblical Truth. The Lost Ten Tribes in the West "
"Ephraim. The Gentile Children of Israel"
"Joseph. The Israelite Destiny of America",
PLUS a sample issue of our
  magazine BRIT-AM Truth
Any two  of the above four books plus an issue of the magazine for $30
All four books plus an issue of the magazine for $50

Magazine "Brit-Am Truth" usual price $15 one issue
5 issues $40
12 issues $80
20 issues for $120

Upon subscribing (for five issues or more) you will receive an official
membership certificate
with the Brit-Am symbol in colors of  red,  white, and blue.
The prices include postage by  air-mail.
Send a personal check to the address below:

Yair Davidiy
POB 595
Jerusalem 91004
Israel

http://www.britam.org
http://www.geocities.com/hiberi
"And I will bless them that bless you" (Genesis 12:15).

PayPal
http://www.britam.org/order.html

NOW INDEX