|
Details on How To Contribute to Brit-Am http://britam.org/contribute-Brit-Am.html |
|
Brit-Am Discussion Group |
Contents by Subject |
Research Recognition Reconciliation Contribute |
Site Map Contents in Alphabetical Order |
This Site |
Some of the Brit-Am Bible Codes Findings were very significant, e.g. the exact
placement of Tserefat (France in Hebrew) with the Sons of Rueben.
http://www.britam.org/codesarticles/CodesFrance.html
The finding by Jim Wright of the word Dolmen in Jeremiah 31:15 was also very
significant.
http://www.britam.org/codesbrit/CodesDolmen.html
Perhaps Brit-Am and its followers tend to underrate ourselves?
Are we too self-effacing?
Shalom Yair,
I am pleased with the Brit Am Plan you have established,
but I'm having some trouble with part b(2).
(2) Convincing Jews that the Lost Tribes are in the west.
I have a friend who moved here from Israel and he not only refuses to believe the Lost Tribes are in the west but he doesn't believe there are any lost tribes at all.He says all the tribes returned when the state of Israel was established. I've had him read your Hebrew book on the tribes,"Our Other Brothers" to no avail. I bought both an English version and a Hebrew version of RAMBAN's Sefer HaGeula. Surely he would believe the RAMBAN. I read the English version and then used my rudimentary Hebrew reading skills to compare to the Hebrew version to ensure the basic message is the same in both versions. They seem to differ in some minor aspects, but the Hebrew version also has commentary that I'm not skilled enough to translate. I gave him the Hebrew version to read and he's still not convinced. He says if I read it and concluded the redemption of the lost tribes is still a future event then I've read it wrong. Have you read the Hebrew version published by Feldheim Publishers? Is it the commentary that leads the reader astray or is my friend just being stubborn?
Wes B.
Nachmanides says: The Israelites went into Exile and ever since then Ephraim and all [the ten tribes of northern] Israel have never been in the Land of Israel... There was no Redemption for the Ten Tribes who remained in exile.... # AND THE HOUSE OF JACOB SHALL BE A FIRE, AND THE HOUSE OF JOSEPH A FLAME, AND THE HOUSE OF ESAU FOR STUBBLE, AND THEY SHALL KINDLE IN THEM, AND DEVOUR THEM; AND THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY REMAINING OF THE HOUSE OF ESAU; FOR THE LORD HATH SPOKEN IT # [Obadiah 1:18]. There are those who say that this prophecy of Obadiah is referring to King Hezekiah in the Second Temple period but those who think so are in error. It is obvious from Scripture that this term, i.e. House of Joseph, applies to the Kingdom of Israel who are the Ten Tribes. They should be ashamed not to recognize this fact! The above verse proves it! When was the House of Joseph like a flame devouring the stubble of Esau? Not in Biblical times! The Ten Tribes had already been exiled and they are still in Exile, in the area of the Canaanites, even unto Zarephath: ?And this first exile of the children of Israel who are [now] from Canaan unto Zarephath? [Obadiah 1:20]. [Rashi, Iben Ezra, Radak and others say that Zarephath means France, Abarbanel says it means France and Britain]. Rabbi Chaim David Chavel who prepared the Hebrew Original for publication says in an editorial footnote (p. 275): These places are at the extremes of the north. When did they [the Ten Tribes] come back and when were these enormous exiled groups ingathered to inherit the cities of Ephraim and Samaria? When did saviours go up on Mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau? In the time of Ezra only a few returned as pigeons to their dovecotes. It says, ?the kingdom shall be the LORD's? [Obadiah 1:21]. At that time everyone will openly acknowledge the Kingdom of God. ?And the LORD shall be King over all the earth? (Zechariah 14;9). This too will happen in the future. The general principle concerning these and all similar verses concerning the Redemption of Israel and the fall of Edom and the like is that it is all for the future. |
|
All truth passes through three
stages: First it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860). |
Pleased with what you read?
Click Here to make an offering. |
|