body style="margin-left: 70px;margin-right: 70px;margin-top: 70pt;margin-bottom: 70pt;">
Brit-Am Discussion Group |
Contents by Subject |
Research Recognition Reconciliation Contribute |
Site Map Contents in Alphabetical Order |
This Site |
The Israel Identity Haplogroup Issue The large variety of haplogroup markers in the Middle East (see JD McDonalds (2005) research map) corroborates the Biblical account of Assyrian invasions that removed almost the entire population of the Northern Kingdom of Israel and a very large proportion of Judah, and replaced them with various peoples from a whole range of conquered provinces from beyond the Taurus mountains in modern Turkey to the Zagros in modern Iran. The shape of Abraham, Isaac and Jacobs "Y" chromosome is not known. What if it was in fact R1b, i.e. that of Western Europeans many of whom according to Milton.J, Camden.W and Turner.S histories of the British people are known to have migrated from the Middle East. The haplogroups "J1 & J2" largely associated with Jews could have developed from R1b simply by loss of the extra DNA information that distinguishes J from R. Furthermore, the Jews (largely from the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi) and the Ten Tribes have been separated for about 3,000 years. The length of separation together with some foreign infusion on both sides, environmental influences, genetic drift, etc, is more than enough to explain any differences that may exist between the two bodies. Moreover, it is only correct to say that the ?Y? chromosome is conveyed largely unchanged throughout successive generations of males. It is not true to say that no combination occurs between the Y and X chromosomes. According to Stanford School of Medicine (Genetics) the "Y" chromosome not only recombines with up to 5% of the "X", it also recombines with its own "Y" duplicate DNA. The male DNA (Y chromosome) of Jews is close to that of groups who have dwelt in the Middle East for an extended period such as the Kurds, Turks, Armenians and to a lesser degree Arabs. This however should be explained by geographical provenance. The Jews were in the Middle East for much longer than the Ten Tribes and the Jewish DNA type was determined by environmental influences. Conventional DNA theory attributes all major changes to UEPs (Unique Event Polymorphisms) meaning that single mutation somewhere along the line becomes the ancestral factor to all further appearances of that phenomenon. The evidence indicates however that instead of UEPS we actually have REP (Repeat Event Polymorphisms) with the same effect occurring almost simultaneously in more than one paternal source. Once the changes occur they are indeed transmitted by heredity. The changes themselves however may be triggered off by environment, nitrogen in the soil, the presence of metals, diet, and other factors. Fertilizers shape plant genomes. Conventional DNA based on the Y Chromosome (transmitted only by males) leads to the following conclusions: Most Japanese (haplogroup D) are closer to Africans (DE, E) than they are to Chinese and Koreans (O). East Europeans (R1a) and West European Celts (R1b) are much closer to Amerindians (Q), Chinese and Koreans (O), than they are to Scandinavians, North Germanics, Sardinians, Croats (I), and Jews, Greeks, and Arabs (J) North African white Berbers, Mediterranean and Balkan whites along with ca. 20% of Ashkenazic Jews (E3b), are a branch of black Africans (E3a).These apparent anomalies may have something to them but we doubt it. The mistaken perception has come about due to DNA researchers wishing to understand DNA reality as an evolutionary sequence. This has led them to depart from their own principles of research. The progression from one haplogroup to another (if it took place) in fact is more likely to have gone from a "developed" haplogroup (such as R or N) losing information. Observed mutations indicate the loss of DNA information. Finally, Israel identity researchers have continually protested that the Anglo Saxon / Cymri-Celtic / Norman peoples are largely of common stock. This is now ably demonstrated by current haplogroup data as seen on JD McDonalds (2005)research map.
Pleased with what you read?
Click Here to make an offering. |
PREVIOUS ISSUES |