"Brit-Am News"-2
Contents:
1. Thor Heyerdahl: NYTimes.com Article
2. The Azerbaijan Connection: Challenging Euro-Centric Theories of Migration
by Dr. Thor Heyerdahl
Thor Heyerdahl, the Norwegian anthropologist
and adventurer
whose imagination and vigor brought
him acclaim navigating
the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans
to advance his
controversial theories of ancient seafaring
migrations,
died yesterday. He was 87.
Mr. Heyerdahl died of cancer in Italy,
where he had been
vacationing, his family said. He had
lived in recent years
in Güímar, Tenerife, in
the Canary Islands.
Fame came to Mr. Heyerdahl in 1947,
at the age of 32. A
tall, lean man in an appropriately
Viking mold, he and five
others crossed a broad stretch of the
Pacific in the
balsa-log raft Kon-Tiki, seeking to
prove that the
Polynesian islands could have been
settled by prehistoric
South American people.
The 101-day, 4,300-mile drifting voyage
on the
40-square-foot raft, a replica of pre-Inca
vessels, took
them safely from Peru to Raroia, a
coral island near
Tahiti. This demonstrated to Mr. Heyerdahl's
satisfaction
that his theory could be fact. He was
convinced that
Polynesia's first settlers had come
from South America, and
not from Asia by way of the western
Pacific islands, as
nearly all scholars thought.
Mr. Heyerdahl was an ardent exponent
of the "diffusionist"
school of cultural anthropology, which
holds that cultural
similarities between geographically
separated societies are
not necessarily spontaneous coincidence
but sometimes are
the result of contacts in antiquity.
Diffusionism has
largely fallen out of favor among most
anthropologists and
historians.
Few scholars at the time - and almost
none today - endorsed
the idea that American Indians peopled
Polynesia. They
discount the Heyerdahl hypothesis largely
on linguistic,
genetic and cultural grounds, all of
which point to the
settlers having come from the west,
not the east.
The epic voyage, nonetheless, caught
the imagination of the
world. Mr. Heyerdahl was an instant
popular hero. And his
storytelling skill turned the book
"Kon-Tiki" into an
international best seller that was
translated into 65
languages. A documentary movie of the
exploits won an
Oscar.
That was only a beginning. Mr. Heyerdahl
invested much of
his book royalties in further expeditions.
The most
important was a 1970 voyage across
the Atlantic in a
papyrus boat to show that ancient Egyptians
could have
introduced pyramid-building technologies
to pre-Columbian
Americans. In 1977 he set out in a
reed boat of ancient
design to discover how Mesopotamian
mariners of 5,000 years
ago might have navigated the Indian
Ocean.
Two years later, Mr. Heyerdahl, well
into his 60's, said in
an interview that he was retiring from
such seagoing
adventures.
"There are no other oceans to cope
with, and also I know of
no other kind of early boat that hasn't
been tried by
others," he said. "I have challenged
a lot of old dogma,
and this has stimulated a lot of discussion.
And in science
you need discussion."
But he continued writing books, traveling
far and wide and
defending his theories. Earlier this
year he went to Samoa,
in the Pacific, to inspect archaeological
excavations of
what could be an ancient pyramid. His
son Thor Heyerdahl
Jr. told Reuters that his father, until
his death, held
firm to his belief that intercontinental
sea migrations
helped spread human culture.
Nor did he let age discourage him from
new quests. In
recent months, he was writing a new
book contending that
Odin, the god of Norse mythology, might
have been a real
king.
Thor Heyerdahl was born Oct. 6, 1914,
in Larvik, in
southern Norway. He once noted that
he did not share from
birth the affinity for the sea that
his Norwegian heritage
and lifelong work might have suggested.
"All my ancestors came from inland,"
he said in 1979. "I
was dead scared of the water as a young
man. If I had been
a sailor, I would have believed that
you couldn't cross the
ocean in the Kon-Tiki. My ignorance
was very lucky."
Young Thor's father owned a brewery
and his mother was head
of the local museum. It was her influence
that led him to
the study of nature and zoology. At
the University of Oslo,
he specialized in zoology, as well
as geography, but before
graduating left on his first expedition
to Polynesia, in
1937-38.
He went with his bride, Liv Coucheron
Torp Heyerdahl, "to
spend a year living as Adam and Eve,"
as he wrote, on Fatu
Hiva in the Marquesas Islands. They
lived there under
primitive conditions, conducting research
on the flora and
fauna. (They were later divorced.)
There he also began to contemplate
the question of how the
Pacific inhabitants reached these widely
scattered islands.
He came to believe that human settlers
had arrived with the
ocean currents from the east, just
as much of the
vegetation and animal life had done.
The time on Fatu Hiva - described in
his 1974 book, "Fatu
Hiva: Back to Nature," and recalled
again in a 1996 book,
"Green Was the Earth on the Seventh
Day" - turned him to
the study of anthropology. He pursued
his research in Peru,
which made firmer his conviction that
a group of tall, fair
pre-Inca people, under the leadership
of the legendary
Kon-Tiki, sailed westward across the
ocean to Polynesia.
During World War II, Mr. Heyerdahl
served in the Free
Norwegian armed forces, mostly as a
parachutist. After the
war, he tried to interest publishers
and scientists in his
Polynesian theory, but came to realize
that prevailing
opinion was so strongly against it
that a practical
demonstration of its feasibility was
the only answer.
He raised the money, overcame innumerable
practical
obstacles right down to the cutting
of the long balsa logs
he needed, recruited five friends to
go with him and set
off on the Kon-Tiki.
Mr. Heyerdahl's book "Kon-Tiki" was
praised by Lewis
Gannett in The New York Herald Tribune
as "a superb
adventure story." Harry Gilroy, in
The New York Times,
wrote: "Their saga, told by the expedition's
organizer, is
a revelation of how exciting science
can become when it
inspires a man with the heart of a
Leif Ericsson and the
merry story-telling gift of an Ernie
Pyle."
The book was less successful with the
scientific community.
In 1958, for example, Dr. Alan S. C.
Ross, a linguist at
the University of Birmingham in England
said language
studies provided "an absolutely decisive
disproof" of Mr.
Heyerdahl's theory. There was, Dr.
Ross wrote, no
relationship between Polynesian and
any American language
family.
Mr. Heyerdahl insisted, however, that
in his mind he had
proved his thesis - not that the crossing
had been done,
but that it could have been done.
Next, Mr. Heyerdahl led an archaeological
expedition in
1953 to the Galápagos Islands,
700 miles off the coast of
Ecuador. He found evidence that convinced
him that
predecessors of the Incas had visited
the islands, and that
they had had the nautical sophistication
to be able to
return home against the wind.
In 1955 and 1956, Mr. Heyerdahl tackled
the mystery of
remote Easter Island. He experimented
with the techniques
that might have been used in creating
and placing upright
the enormous stone figures for which
the island is famous.
"Aku-Aku," published in 1958, was a
vivid account of the
expedition. He later published scholarly
accounts of this
and the Kon-Tiki voyages.
Mr. Heyerdahl argued that Easter Island
was also colonized
by South Americans, which led one critic,
the British
archaeologist Paul G. Bahn, to write,
"It is unfortunate
that he has allowed his obsession with
a South American
connection to overshadow the far more
interesting and
important subjects of the islanders'
cultural history, way
of life and destruction of their environment."
Mr. Heyerdahl then turned his attention
to the possibility
of a migration from Egypt to America,
because of what he
felt were striking cultural parallels,
notably pyramid
building. Most scholars doubted that
the Egyptians had
ships capable of so long a voyage.
So Mr. Heyerdahl decided
on a practical demonstration. Using
ancient representations
of Egyptian reed boats as his guide,
he had a reed ship
built and named it Ra, after the Egyptian
Sun god.
The first attempt, in 1969, fell short.
The waterlogged
ship had to be abandoned 600 miles
from its destination in
Barbados. Undaunted, Mr. Heyerdahl
tried again the next
year. He said it was on this successful
57-day journey, on
Ra II, that he first noted the "alarming"
pollution of the
ocean, a subject he continued to raise
forcefully.
Political strife shortened his 1977-78
voyage with another
reed boat in the Indian Ocean and Red
Sea. Reaching the
coast of Ethiopia, he was refused permission
to land
because of warfare. He then abandoned
the voyage, setting
fire to the boat "to protest against
the inhuman elements
of the world of 1978."
With these expeditions, Mr. Heyerdahl
said: "I have proved
that all the ancient pre-European civilizations
could have
intercommunicated across oceans with
the primitive vessels
they had at their disposal. I feel
that the burden of proof
now rests with those who claim the
oceans were necessarily
a factor in isolating civilizations."
Most anthropologists think otherwise.
Mr. Heyerdahl's first wife, whom he
divorced in 1949, died in 1969. He was
also divorced from his second wife,
Yvonne Dedekam-Simonsen
Heyerdahl, who survives. In 1996, he
married Jacqueline
Beer Heyerdahl, a French-born Hollywood
actress, who also
survives.
Other survivors, besides his son Thor,
of Lillehammer,
Norway, are another son, Bjorn, who
lives near Allassio,
Italy; two daughters, Marian and Helene
Elisabeth, both of
Oslo; seven grandchildren and six great-grandchildren.
In recent years, Mr. Heyerdahl received
many honors,
including the distinction, according
to a public opinion
poll, of being "Norwegian of the Century."
And in recent
months, he visited Cuba and Norway,
as well as Samoa. He
sponsored excavations in southern Russia
in search of
artifacts to support his last obsession,
that Odin was a
historical personage from what is now
Russia who began a
Scandinavian royal line in the first
century A.D.
As with his theory on the peopling
of the Pacific, his case
for Odin has been largely dismissed
by establishment
academics, but as always, he seemed
to thrive in the
limelight of controversy and the telling
of a good story.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/19/obituaries/19HEYE.html?ex=1020213886&ei=1&en=e50e0fc29e196bf3
The Azerbaijan Connection
Challenging Euro-Centric Theories of
Migration
by Dr. Thor Heyerdahl
<http://216.239.51.100/31_photos/31_20.jpg>
<http://216.239.51.100/graphics/gifs-mixed/atransparent.gif>
Thor Heyerdahl
in Azerbaijan
In late November 1994, Dr. Thor Heyerdahl
visited Azerbaijan where, among
other things, he wanted another chance
to see the boat petroglyphs of the
ancient caves of Gobustan not far from
Baku.
Here, in the pages of Azerbaijan International,
Heyerdahl makes public for
the first time his "growing suspicion"
that Azerbaijanis may be ancestors
of the Scandinavians including his
own native countrymen in Norway.
In the global research that I've been
involved with for many years,
Azerbaijan is beginning to play a rather
pivotal role. My growing suspicion
is that what today is left as the little
Republic of Azerbaijan around the
capital Baku is only vestiges of what
was once a large and dynamic nation
bordering on an inland sea but transmitting
merchandise and even colonists
to remote outposts in both Asia and
Europe.
For a long time, I've been puzzled by
the fact that three great
civilizations surrounding the Arabian
peninsula appeared in about 3,000
B.C. as ready-developed, organized
dynasties at the same astonishingly high
level and all three were remarkably
alike. The definite impression is that
related priest-kings at that time came
from elsewhere with their respective
entourages, and imposed their dynasties
on areas formerly occupied by more
primitive or, at least, culturally
far less advanced, tribes.
Boat Petroglyphs
But where could they have come from?
Is there a "zero hour for civilized
man"? I've been convinced for quite
some time that the clues to this
mystery, no doubt, lie in the prehistoric
boat petroglyphs which are found
on widely scattered continental shores
and islands all over the world and
even near dried-out waterways deep
inside the Sahara Desert. Petroglyphs
and rock paintings of watercraft represent
the earliest known illustrations
of human architecture and even predate
pictures of dwellings or temples.
I've seen such sketches from below
the equator in Polynesia to above the
Arctic Circle in Northern Norway. Everywhere
they testify to the fact that
boats were of extreme importance to
early man as they provided security and
transportation millennia before there
were roads through the wilderness.
Our lack of knowledge about our own
past is appalling. In the course of two
million years of human activity, ice
has come and gone, and land has
emerged and submerged. Forest humus,
desert sand, river silt and volcanic
eruptions have hidden from view large
portions of the former surface of the
earth. The sea level has altered; 70%
of our planet is now below water, and
underwater archaeology has barely begun
in coastal areas. We are accustomed
to finding sunken ships with old amphora
and other cargo beneath the sea,
but speculation as to the discovery
of other human vestiges on the bottom
of the ocean still remains a subject
for science fiction writers.
Identical Petroglyphs in Norway and
Azerbaijan
It may not be pure coincidence that
the ship petroglyphs that the early
Azeri depicted while navigating on
the Caspian Sea and up the Russian
rivers are identical to those of the
ancestors of the Vikings along the
fjords of Norway millennia later. In
Scandinavia, there are two different
types of boat petroglyphs, both well
represented in Norway. One is similar
to those at Gobustan and is drawn as
a simple sickle-shaped line which
forms the base of the ship with vertical
lines on deck to illustrate crew
or raised oars.
Famous "Foldable Boats"
The other ship type probably represents
a "skin boat" with a rather short
and bulky hull and an interior framework
of wood, appearing on the
petroglyphs as if viewed from outside.
Such a boat is mentioned in early
Norwegian sagas written down by the
Icelander, Snorre Sturlason, before his
death in 1241, (Snorri, The Sagas of
the Viking Kings of Norway. English
translation: J. M. Stenersens Forlag,
Oslo 1987). According to the saga,
the Viking kings descended from Odin,
an immigrant hierarch who came in a
vessel called Skithblathnir (Skidbladner)
which could be folded together
like a cloth. Odin came from the land
of the "Aser", and is, therefore,
frequently referred to as "Asa-Odin".
The legendary land of the people
known as Aser is given a very exact
location in Snorre's saga as east of
the Caucasus mountains and the Black
Sea.
From there, according to the same saga,
Odin, owner of the foldable boat
migrated with all his people northwestwardly
through Russia, Saxland, and
Denmark into Sweden where he died and
lay buried in a huge funerary mound
at Sigtuna. Asa-Odin's saga with his
boat and his itinerary has been
considered by Nordic historians as
a myth concocted in medieval times,
although they consider the Nordic people
as Caucasians. But, perhaps,
Odin's boat may indicate that the land
of the Aser really lay by the
Caspian Sea east of the Caucasus. In
fact, in the 5th century B.C., the
Greek historian, Herodotus, described
such marvelous foldable boats used
precisely in the area referred to in
Asa-Odin's saga as the home of th
Aser, namely the land of the present
day Azeri and Armenians.
In this area, Herodotus wrote, traveling
merchants used boats built with a
framework of wood and canes covered
with skin, and of such great size that
they carried one or more donkeys in
addition to crew and cargo. They
navigated down river to Babylonia where
they sold their merchandise and the
framework (wood), then they folded
the skins and loaded them on the donkeys
for their return upstream in preparation
for the next voyage.
Oral Tradition or Fairy Tale?
I'm personally convinced that Snorre
recorded oral history rather than a
concocted myth, and I think it's time
to look for the land that my
Scandinavian ancestors came from and
not merely where they subsequently
went on their Viking raids and explorations.
They certainly did not come
out from under the glaciers when the
ice-age ended so they must have
immigrated from the south. Since their
physical type is referred to as
Caucasian and their very own descendant
preserved an itinerary from south
of the Caucasus and north of Turkey,
I suspect that the present Azeri
people and the Aser of the Norse sagas
have common roots and that my
ancestry originated there.
The unwritten history of both the Scandinavians
and the Azeri doubtlessly
began with ships and navigation. Both
had access to waterways which
permitted them to explore and travel
far and wide. The Azeri could easily
have sailed across their inland sea
to the great centers of civilization in
antiquity and up the river Volga which
was navigable past present-day
Moscow to its sources which are suspiciously
close to the sources of the
river Dvina which empties into the
Baltic Sea at Riga, where the first
Christian Norwegian Viking king, Olav
Trygvason, was born.
Azerbaijan as Spreading Center of Caucasians,
not Europe
This would mean that Azerbaijan and
not northern Europe was the spreading
center of the Caucasian people buried
in northwestern China some 4,000
years ago and now discovered by Chinese
archaeologists who theorize
(probably wrongly) that they came from
northern Europe because they were
tall, blond, blue-eyed and with Caucasian
features. According to modern
scholars in Azerbaijan, there used
to be a strong blond and fair-skinned
element in the aboriginal Azeri population,
as illustrated by the stone-age
hunters at the Gobustan Museum. Subsequent
invasions by Romans and Arabs
have somewhat modified the original
Azeri type.
As to the remarkably high level of culture
evinced by the 4,000 year old
mummies in China, no people in Northern
Europe had reached a corresponding
cultural level at that early time.
But the merchants of Azerbaijan could
have, due to their long-range trade
by skin-boats with Babylonia.
Beyond a Euro-Centric Perspective
We must as scientists get beyond the
dogmatic medieval view of history
printed by us in Europe in which we
describe our own ancestors as the
discoverers of the rest of the world.
There were advanced civilizations
with navigators and script in Asia,
Africa and Middle America before
mariners from Crete brought script
and civilization from the Middle East to
southern Europe. Before European history
began, mariners from Africa had
settled the Canary Island, voyagers
from America had settled the West
Indies, and every inhabitable island
in the Indian Ocean and the Pacific
had been peopled from Asia and America.
Azerbaijan, and not Europe, was
part of the fermenting kettle of brewing
civilization with navigators that
spread early trade and cultural impulses
far and wide.
Many clues are still invisible about
the human history prior to the sudden
cultural bloom in Egypt, Sumer and
the Indus valley some five millennia
ago. But with advanced technology,
some day the answers may be found under
the sand and sea. The challenge for
scholars is to look deeper into foreign
relations in the region of present-day
Azerbaijan to determine what those
prehistoric roots and linkages were.
From Azerbaijan International (3.1)
Spring 1995.
© Azerbaijan International 1995.
All rights reserved