"Brit-Am Now"-314
10-26-03-(5764)
Contents:
1. Cherokee Indians
2. Ancient City
Excavated in Israel
3. Excavations at Tartessos
1. Cherokee
Indians
From: Ireland South Farms
Dear Yair,
Have you heard of the
Cherokee Indians and their claim that they are
descended from survivors who
escaped from Masada. This is kept alive by
their oral traditions and history
that has been handed down through the
centuries. They claim that they were
the Sicarii who escaped and managed to
cross the water to this land and
later became known as Cherokees. When they
marry, both the man and woman are
covered by a large blue blanket with 365
tassels on it and each brings a
stick which are bound together when they
are married. They celebrate 7
festivals throughout the year and must
immerse in water before hand and not
touch any unclean thing. Women also
seem to follow the rules of Niddah. If
this is so, and I tend to think so,
is incredible. Americans who have been
here for over a century, claim
somewhere in their family, they have Cherokee
or other Indian blood. :of) Kim
2. Ancient City Excavated in
Israel
Archaeology / Judging by these remains, the Tanakhic description is
anchored in reality []
By Ran Shapira
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/352395.html
Unlike
other cities from the biblical period, Bethsaida has been well
preserved.
Buildings discovered there indicate an organized and stable
society from the
10th century B.C.E.
A road paved with basalt stones, four meters
in
width, leads to the gate of the city of Bethsaida,
which overlooks Lake
Kinneret from the northeast.
About 50 meters of the road were exposed
during
the most recent digging seasons at the site. Dr.
Rami Arav says
that an investigation with
ground-penetrating radar revealed that the
paved
road does not end near the city gate, but
continues.
Dr.
Arav, an archaeologist
from the University of
Nebraska in Omaha,
who
oversees the digs at
Bethsaida, considers the
paved road - which
was
constructed during the 10th
century B.C.E. - to be a
symbol of the
stability and
the prosperity of the kingdom
of Geshur, of which Bethsaida
was the capital.
"A wagon is a massive vehicle. For the farmers
of the
time it was like a car for us today. A
farmer who knew that he could keep a
wagon
outside his house without having to worry that
it would be stolen,
and that anyone who tried
to steal it would be punished, relied on
the
government," explains Arav. "That's why a paved
road is a sign of an
orderly, stable and
law-abiding regime."
The gate to which the road
led was the civic
heart of the kingdom. It was at the gate that
commercial
life was carried out, legal
discussions were held, and news was
received
about events that had occurred all over the
kingdom.
On
the benches placed all along the gate sat the
elders of the city who ran its
daily affairs.
Judging by the altar sites found on both sides
of the gate,
religious ceremonies were held
there as well.
The gate itself was a
monumental structure, the
largest of its kind found in the area
between
Damascus and Egypt. It covered an area of about
half a dunam, and
its walls were built of large
basalt tablets, which were covered with
white
plaster. Some of the walls were well preserved,
and today they rise
to a height of about three
meters. Inside the structure of the gate,
on
both sides, were four large compartments, some
of which served for
storage of ritual objects
and others for the storage of
wheat.
According to Dr. Arav, Bethsaida is one of the
largest cities
dating from the 10th century
B.C.E. found in Israel. Its total area was
over
80 dunams, greater than the area of Jerusalem,
Hatzor and Megiddo
during that period.
The city was surrounded by two walls - a
thin
outer wall and a thick, strong inner wall,
which was constructed of
huge basalt rocks, and
rose to a height of six to eight meters.
The
size of the city, its construction methods,
the road that led to it, and the
religious and
administrative services it provided for the
inhabitants of
Geshur lead Dr. Arav to claim
that the dig he has been conducting for
13
seasons at Bethsaida is of a historical
importance that transcends the
finds at the
site.
The city was built during a period
when,
according to the Bible, the kingdom of David
and Solomon flourished
(the period of the
United Kingdom). But there are almost no
remains of the
Jerusalem of David, and of other
capital cities in the region during
that
period, such as Samaria and Rabbat Ammon.
"Of all the capital
cities in the region, only
Bethsaida was well preserved. It can be seen
as
a model of a capital city from the biblical
period," says Arav. "From
the way it is
constructed we can draw conclusions about how
Jerusalem,
Samaria or other similar cities may
have looked."
The construction of
a big city like Bethsaida
was a complex operation, which
required
engineering and construction skills, as well as
a knowledge of
architectonics. According to
Arav, the impressive success of the
operation
demonstrates that during that period, the
kingdoms in the region
had the ability to carry
out large projects of this kind.
In that
sense, Bethsaida provides support for
the claims of archaeologists and
historians who
believe that the biblical descriptions of the
United
Kingdom and its enterprises are grounded
in reality.
The finds weaken
the claims of those scholars
known as minimalists, who believe that there
is
a gap between the historical truth and the
Tanakhic stories, and that
in the 10th century
B.C.E. there was a tribal society in Israel
rather
than an organized and stable society.
The impressive buildings of
Bethsaida, the wall
and a tower built next to the gate - the only
real
military structure designed to protect the
city - didn't withstand the
soldiers of
Assyrian king Tiglath-Pileser III, who captured
the city in
732 B.C.E., and destroyed the tower
to its foundations.
The city
itself was not totally destroyed, and
remained sparsely occupied for many
years to
come. It served as a home for inhabitants who
came from Tyre,
afterward was captured by the
Hasmoneans, with Philip, son of
Herod,
rebuilding the city and establishing a modest
Roman temple in
it.
But the city never returned to its 10th century
B.C.E. dimensions.
The settlement that remained
in it was in effect a small fishing
village.
3. Excavations at Tartessos
Tartessos in southwest Spain was
called Tarshish in the Bible.
The site is near Gibraltar and encompassed
Gibraltar.
Tarshish is very important for understanding the Brit-Am
explanation of
ancient migratory paths.
A section of the exiled
Israelites were taken to Spain in Phoenician and
Phillistine ships in the
employ of the
Assyrians. They were part of a colonization policy connected
with
foundations laid by the Kingdom of Tarshish.
In Spain the Israelites
moved from the south and southeast to the northwest
and from there to Gaul
and the British Isles
as explained at length in our works "Lost Israelite
Identity" and "Origin".
The following article concerns excavations at a
site linked with Tartessos.
We have provided a few extracts but the article
is worth seeing on the site
it was taken from and read in full alongside the
accompanying photographs,
Illustrations, and map.
Sacred Precincts:
A Tartessian Sanctuary in Ancient Spain
Sebastian Celestino and Carolina
Lopez-Ruiz
http://www.bib-arch.org/bswb_AO/bswbao0606f1.html
When
the Phoenicians arrived on the Iberian peninsula, probably at the end
of the
ninth century B.C., they came into contact with an indigenous people
called
the Tartessians. The two cultures soon fused. The hybrid culture
produced by
this fusion of peoples is evident in a mysterious structure at
Cancho Roano,
deep in the heart of south-central Spain. The structure at
Cancho Roano is
sometimes called a palace-sanctuary because of its
monumentality. But it was
not a palace at all; it was simply a Tartessian
sanctuary, which over time
became influenced by Phoenician culture.*
Scholars have only recently
begun to separate Tartessian history from myth.
When the Greeks reached the
Iberian peninsula a few centuries after the
Phoenicians, they called the
land Tartessos. (The word Tartessosis a Greek
version of the root trt/trd,
which appears in a number of indigenous
namesfor example, Turduli,
Turdetaniof the southwest Iberian peninsula.)
For the Greeks, Tartessos was
the mysterious land on the other side of
Herculess columns (the Rock of
Gibraltar); it was the gateway to the terra
incognita.
According to
the fifth-century B.C. historian Herodotus, Tartessian
civilization was
discovered accidentally by a Greek named Kolaios, who
became extremely rich
as a result of his trade with the Tartessians
(History 4.152 ff.). From
Herodotus, we also learn of a legendary
Tartessian king named Arganthonius
(meaning man [or flower] of silverin
Greek), who welcomed the Greek
merchants with rich gifts.
A number of other ancient works also make
reference to Tartessos. One of
them, Ora Maritima, a tantalizing Latin
account of Phoenician travelers who
explored the Atlantic coast up to
Ireland and Britain, was written in the
late fourth century A.D. by the
Roman fabulist Avienus, who apparently
based his text on a sixth-century
B.C. Punic periplus (travel narrative).
Recent archaeological work
suggests that Tartessos included a number of
small proto-urban settlements
largely dependent on agricultural and mineral
(particularly silver)
exploitation. This is probably what attracted the
Phoenicians and formed the
basis of Tartessian wealth.
Exactly when the Phoenicians arrived remains
in question. According to
ancient sources, such as Strabo (c. 60 B.C.-21
A.D.) and Pliny (23-79
A.D.), they arrived in the late 12th century B.C. and
laid the foundations
of sites such as Cadiz (Gadir) and Utica. But
archaeological excavations at
these sites have not uncovered remains earlier
than the eighth century B.C.
The first-century B.C. historian Diodorus
Siculus (Diodorus of Sicily)
writes that the Phoenicians arrived on the
peninsula while searching for
silver but only settled there much later
(Library of History 5.35.1-5,
5.20.1-2).
Some scholars identify
biblical Tarshish with Iberian Tartessos. The
prophet Isaiah, who lived in
the latter part of the eighth century B.C.,
may refer to the Phoenicians
sailing to the Iberian peninsula and reaching
Tartessos/Tarshish:
The
Lord poised his arm over the sea And made kingdoms quake; It was he
decreed
destruction for Phoenicias strongholds ... Howl, O ships of
Tarshish, For
your stronghold is destroyed. (Isaiah 23:11-15)
Although the location of
biblical Tarshish is much debated, an inscription
of the Assyrian king
Esarhaddon (680-669 B.C.) suggests that it was located
on the Mediterranean
coast: All the kings from (the islands) amidst the sea
from the country
Iadanana [Cyprus], as far as Tarsisi [Tarshish], bowed to
my feet and I
received heavy tribute (from them). 1 Many scholars have
connected Tarshish
to Iberian Tartessos; 2 it is possible that both names,
the Semitic
Tarshish/Tarsisiand the Greek Tartessos, derive from the same
Iberian root,
trt/trd. Nonetheless, the connection between Iberian
Tartessos and biblical
Tarshish can only remain a matter of speculation
until new evidence is
found.
The core area of Tartessian civilization comprised the modern
Spanish
provinces of Cadiz, Seville, Huelva and the Algarve in modern
Portugal.
After the seventh century B.C., Tartessian influence expanded,
reaching the
Guadiana Valley (where Cancho Roano is located) and a
considerable portion
of the southeastern coast of the Iberian Peninsula.
However, the
Tartessians never formed a united country, nor did they create
independent
city-states. What bound the Tartessians together as a people
over this
large territory were their ethnic and cultural traits and,
especially,
their religious beliefs. One of the key institutions for
understanding the
Tartessians is the sacred sanctuary, or shared religious
precinct.
Most of these sanctuaries are in the core of the Tartessian
world, but
there are also many in the periphery (as distant as modern
Portugal). One
of these peripheral sanctuaries is the extraordinary site of
Cancho Roano
(Reddish Rockin Spanish), which functioned from the end of the
seventh
century B.C. to the end of the fifth century B.C.
The
building and its altar were clearly influenced by elements from the
eastern
Mediterranean. For example, the circle-and-triangle altar resembles
the
Phoenician-Punic symbol for the goddess Tanit; but it also resembles
the
Egyptian hieroglyph for eternity,as co-author Sebastián Celestino has
recently suggested. Although the altar appears to fuse Tartessian,
Phoenician and other elements, we do not yet know their meaning or exact
origins.
For some unknown reason, Sanctuary C was deliberately
demolished toward the
end of the sixth century B.C. and its mudbricks were
re-used to construct
the platform of a new building, Sanctuary B, which
remains beautifully
preserved
Like its predecessor, the Sanctuary B
altar was made of mudbrick covered
with white plaster. But it was
constructed in the shape of a stretched-out
oxhidethe same shape as the
so-called oxhide ingots of copper and tin that
were a major cargo on
Phoenician vessels that plied the Mediterranean.
Like Sanctuary C,
Sanctuary B was intentionally destroyed (at the beginning
of the fifth
century), which explains why almost no small finds were
discovered in either
of these strata: Everything was cleared out before the
sanctuaries were
destroyed.
[]
Click for caption.
Not long after the destruction
of Sanctuary B, the inhabitants of Cancho
Roano built the impressive
Sanctuary A, which turned out to be the last
sanctuary built on the
site.
The entire complex was surrounded by a defensive moat.
The
moat, which is over 15 feet deep in places, was dug out of bedrock. We
have
found a great deal of local pottery in the moat. Surprisingly, we have
also
found skeletons of what at first appeared to be horses or donkeys.
Later
analysis showed that these were the bones of a now-extinct equid not
known
anywhere else in the world one smaller than a horse but taller than
a
donkey or a pony. Study of the bones revealed that the animals had not
been
used for hard labor or transportation. Stranger still, they were all
beheaded and buried in the western moat the bones of their bodies at one
end of the moat and their skulls at the other. We have found nearly 30 of
these creatures. Were they sacred animals? Did worshipers mount them for
ritual processions? Did they have some other cultic
function?
Visitors to Sanctuary A would have crossed the moat on a
bridge, which
allowed them access to a monumental gateway. They would then
step from the
bridge onto two steps, made of stone slabs. One of these stone
slabs was a
stela showing a warrior and his armor; this stela was reused
from Sanctuary
D, establishing a continuity between the oldest and newest
structures on
the site.
We have found beautifully crafted rings,
pendants and gold beads with
filigree decoration. We have also found bronze
objects (including a
beautiful infundibulum, or strainer, in the shape of a
ram) and Greek
ceramic vessels, which seem to have been related to the
ritual consumption
of wine. Other finds include perfume flasks, Egyptian
scarabs and ivory
furniture panels. A set of scales with metal pans
indicates the economic
importance of the sanctuary and the commercial
control it must have exercised.
One especially intriguing find from a
perimeter room on the west side is an
8-inch-long bronze horse (opposite) of
Tartessian type, showing a mixture
of indigenous and eastern Mediterranean
elements (probably transported to
the western Mediterranean by the
Phoenicians). Although the horse was very
likely manufactured locally, some
of its features such as the way in which
its parts were assembled and the
decoration of the harness resemble Cypriot
bronzes.
Back To Home Page Back To NOW Index