"Brit-Am Now"-376
March 18, 2004
1. Ulster of Israel - Not "Ireland".
2. Ruth Thomas: Thank You for the Magazines
3. The Darker Side of "Ephraim"

1. Ulster of Israel - Not "Ireland".
 From "F"
Fantastic site, much to explore and learn.  Problem with the lack of
separativeness of Ireland (Republic of) and Ulster (Northern
Ireland).  Lost tribe identity is welcomed in the latter and despised in
the former.  Scots (Ulstermen) highly destinctive as that of Irishmen not
emphasized.  Using term of Ireland lacks Ulster's Israelite identity, it is
simular to calling present day Israel as Palistine.  The British Isles is
mainly two major islands, one with three nations - Britain - (Scotland,
England & Wales) and one with two nations - Ireland - (Ulster/ Northern
Ireland, part of the former, and, Eire/Republic of 'Ireland') hostile to
them all.

It would be greatly appreciated if this was adapted on your site, remember
during WW2 Eire remained neutral against nazism, while Ulster fought openly
against it.
It is also interesting to note that in all the places in Europe that a
'observance' of Hitler's life was acknowledged was by 'Roman mass' in
Dublin & Berlin!

God Bless you all

2. Ruth Thomas: Thank You for the Magazines

Dear Yair,
Thank you very much for the magazines. I read them or should I say
"devoured" them in one day! They were perfect for my genealogy quest. I was
wondering who the Milesians were. That is who my father is supposed to have
descended from. The Milesian name was Dalrenii or Dairenoi. When I read
further about the descendents of Nathan I saw the Danish Kings line. My
grandfather was a Mcleod, a family from Scotland that descends from the
Norwegian Kings. I couldn't help but remember your e-mail saying we could
be from the same family. Well it could very well be that my ancestors are
from the line of Judah.

I was also wanting to share with you a "sort of" panic going through the
evangelical circles the last few days on all the airways. The main leaders
are more than concerned about our presidential race. Saying that if the
liberals win this election it could be the end of our Judeo-Christian
freedoms. The end of Western Civilization, brought on by the destruction of
its Judeo-Christian roots, including the Ten Commandments, and by the
sanctioned erosion of the family that was ordained from God from the
Creation. If the poles are correct; we are split down the middle. Many
Christians in the past have voted their pocket books above their morality.
Here is one example that you may find interesting.
I can't help but think of what of what brought us to America (religious
freedom) and what if we loose these freedoms and the worse does come to
pass. If the doors open for us to go to Israel, the one place we can serve
our God. The whole world will hate us and want to destroy all of us........

3. The Darker Side of "Ephraim"
The British Rule of "Palestine" on the whole was greatly favorable to the Jews
in all respects as we have mentioned in "The Tribes", in articles in our
and also
in our Hebrew-language book "Achim Acharim".
Nevertheless there were always anti-semites in the British administration.
About a 100 yards from my house is a memorial plaque for a 16 year ol Jewish
boy who was tortured and killed by the British for handing out "subversive"
British Government policies on occasion took an anti-Jewish or anti-Zionist
After World War II the labor party came to power in Britain and Foreign
Ernest Bevan was especially nasty.
In 1948 the British left and war with the Arabs broke out but the
hostilities had actually began
before the British withdrew and while they were in the process of leaving
the war had more or less begun.
British officials on the ground handed over the administration mainly to
Jewish replacements
appointed by Jewish agencies. This did much to ensure ultimate victory )see
Tom Segev, "One Palestine Complete" p.513).
On the other hand in some cases the British helped the Arabs and British
officers commanded the Arab Jordanian Legion
that attacked the Jews.
At first the struggle was against the local Palestinian Arabs aided by
outsiders and then against the neighboring
Arab states who launched an attack against the Jewish settlement.
It is worth keeping both aspects (the pro-Jewish and the anti-Jewish) of
the story in mind.
Similarly at present most of the world is against the State of Israel but
the USA is helping us
and even so things could change and anti-Israel elements are also present
in the US
administration and occasionally express themselves.

We have to believe in the Bible, serve our peoples, believe in Brit-Am and
at the same time
acknowledge the truth even when on a superficial level it may seem to be
against us.
That is why we are posting out the following extracts:

British Colonialism Fomented Arab Violence in 1948 said "Nation" -
Back then!

Emperor's Clothes Newsletter
Please send this text or the link to a friend.

Emperor's Clothes [ www.tenc.net ]
In 1948, the Left-wing Nation magazine exposed British support for
and instigation of Arab League violence aimed at crushing Israel in
the cradle. This entirely contradicts current Left-wing (and much
Right-wing) and pro-PLO dogma.

"The British Record on Partition"
(First part of the article)
Reprinted from The Nation, May 8, 1948
Comments by Jared Israel
[Posted 9 March 2004]
[ www.tenc.net ]

The unchallenged belief of most of the Left and the anti-Jewish Right
and much of the media is that Israel was conceived as an outpost of
European colonialism. But articles we found when reading bound
volumes of the left-wing Nation magazine from the crucial years 1947-
1949 - when Arab League forces tried to crush embryonic Israel - tell
the opposite story.   It is notable that some of these articles have
apparently been censored from the online archives of today's Nation

We have started transcribing one such article from the May 8, 1948
Nation: "The British Record on Partition." The first part is posted
below. This article is based on a Memorandum that the Nation
submitted to the UN.  Using UK intelligence documents, it exposes
British collusion with and indeed leadership of the Arab attempt to
crush Israel in the cradle.

Today The Nation, a leading Left publication, is vehemently anti-
Israel. The Nation's articles from 1947-1949, exposing US State
Department support for - and British Foreign Office sponsorship of -
the Arab side, including British importation of Nazi Generals
to 'advise' the Arab armies, are an embarrassment for The Nation. Is
that why "The British Record on Partition" and some similar articles
are seemingly not included in The Nation's online digital archives?

This expos from the 1948 Nation radically contradicts the picture of
the 1947-9 Arab-Jewish war as put forward by the Left (and others!)

According to the now-common conception, Israel was founded by Jews
who were supposedly sponsored by Britain and the US and who
supposedly emulated Hitler's tactics in fighting Arabs who were
supposedly only trying to protect their land.

But according to this Nation expos , the Arab side was mobilized and
aided every step of the way by British colonialism. And the British
were fully aware that Nazi troops - e.g., specialists from the
Bosnian Waffen SS and high-ranking Nazi officers - as well as British
officers were helping lead the Arab side.
Jared Israel
Editor, Emperor's Clothes

The British Record on Partition
as revealed in
British Military Intelligence And Other Official Sources

A Memorandum Submitted to the Special Session
of The General Assembly of the United Nations

April 1948

Published by The Nation Associates
20 Vesey Street
New York 7, N.Y.

Volume 166   New York * Saturday * May 8, 1948  No. 19, Part II

The pages which follows present in condensed form a memorandum which
was submitted by The Nation Associates to the General Assembly of the
United Nations on April 30, [1948] covering the British record in
Palestine since November 29, 1947.

  An examination of the facts
will show that the present violence in Palestine results from:

1) British sabotage of Partition  --  This British sabotage was
deliberately undertaken in order to insure British base rights in
Palestine in perpetuity, as well as to safeguard British oil and
trade and military interests in the Middle East.

2) British Alliance with Arab League -- To achieve these ends, the
British have embarked on an alliance with the Arab League, composed
of the governments of Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Transjordan,
and Yemen.  The Arab League, and not the Arab Higher Committee,
controls the military and political developments among the Arabs of
Palestine.   Representatives of the British government were present
at the meetings of the Arab League where the revolt was planned and
organized and are in continuous connection with it.  Within a month
after the November 29th resolution, the Arabs were encouraged to
believe partition would be substituted by a Federal State, and arms
shipments continued to the Arab States despite their known use for
Palestine warfare.   On April 28 [1948] Foreign Minister Bevin was
still refusing to halt them.

The facts will show, moreover, that:

The British have allowed 10,000 foreign invaders to enter Palestine,
offering the feeble excuse that the British armed forces, consisting,
at the outset, of over 80,000 men, could not adequately protect the

Although since December 11, 1947 the British have been promising to
return to Transjordan the contingents of the Arab Legion brought to
Palestine for police duty they have allowed the members of that force
to remain in Palestine and to attack Jewish communities.   The only
conclusion to be drawn is that the Arab Legion constitutes a major
part of the effort to coerce the Jews into accepting less than the
Jewish State granted by the United Nations.

At no time has the British government, in spite of its alleged
impotence, requested any help from the United Nations; in fact, as
the record shows, the British have continued to deprecate the
situation, refused to identify the invaders, and have consistently
denied that the Arab states as such are involved.

Through their action they have admitted into Palestine Arabs of known
Nazi allegiance in command of the invading forces, and have even
admitted escaped Nazi prisoners of war, now to be found in command of
Arab detachments.  From secret British intelligence reports, which
are quoted extensively in this record, it is clear that the British
know and have always known of every single Arab troop movement in
Palestine, and that their relations with the Arabs are such that they
could ask Arab leaders to request the invading forces to remain

British sabotage has resulted in turning Jerusalem into an armed
camp, has permitted the Arabs to seize the Old City and to hold as
hostages some 2000 Jews.

The British have failed to take any action to insure that Haifa
should remain an open city even though they were fully aware of the
desire to local Arabs to achieve this and that the Jews wanted only
to be safe from attack.

Their prejudice against the Jews has been clearly indicated in their
refusal to allow the Jews to arm for defense against Arab attack, and
their blowing up of Jewish defense posts; in their turning over to
the Arabs - and to certain death - members of the Haganah; in their
confiscation of Haganah arms; in their treatment of Jewish defense
personnel as criminals. The British have connived at the starving of
the Jewish population of Jerusalem by their failure to keep the
highways open.   They have refused armed escorts to the Jews.

Their attitude to the Arab community is quite different.  By British
admission, the Arab community has been armed by the British.  Arab
train robberies, which have been frequent, have been met with
shooting over the heads of the robbers.  Arab desertions from the
police, for the purpose of joining the attackers, accompanied by the
stealing of arms, have never been prevented, and Arab violators of
the peace go unpunished.

To this record can be added the detailed facts concerning the fashion
in which the British have destroyed central authority, and, under the
guise of establishing greater local authority, turned over in largest
part to the Arabs the various services of the Palestine government
created and maintained chiefly by taxation of the Jewish community.
Simultaneously, assets have been dissipated and vital communications
disposed of to foreign agencies.  The effect of this has been to seal
the Jewish community in a limited area, cut off its access to the
outside world by land and sea, and surround it by Arabs in order to
create such a state of siege as would cause the Jews to send up a
white flag.

By arrangement with the Arab League, if partition is shelved through
any one of several schemes to assure Arab dominance in Palestine, the
British are to receive base rights in Haifa, the Negev and Galilee.

Freda Kirchwey, President
The Nation Associations