"Brit-Am Now"-741
1. France's Newly Discovered "Stonehenge"
2. Question from Baruch: Will France Invade Israel?
;3. Steve Mathe: Message from the Irish Psalms

1. France's Newly Discovered "Stonehenge"
by John Lichfield:
"France's new Stonehenge: Secrets of a neolithic time machine"
[Extracts Only]
[Note: Dates given in this article may be according to conventional understanding but are mistaken.
Very doubtful if anything found in the region in question dates before ca. 600-500 BCE]

A spectacular discovery of Stone Age menhirs in Brittany could unlock the code to one of the most puzzling chapters of human development, and transform our knowledge of mankind's early history
By John Lichfield

Published: 31 July 2006

Some months ago builders were clearing a piece of wasteland in southern Brittany when they struck an enormous hunk of granite. The developer was no historian but he knew instantly what the obstacle must be: the remains of a buried "menhir" or neolithic standing stone.

He ordered a bulldozer to shove the stone underground again before any passing busybody spotted it. He did not want the work on his six seaside bungalows to be halted for a prolonged archaeological dig.

Brittany, he probably reasoned, is crammed with old stones. At Carnac - the largest neolithic site in the world, just down the road - there is a linear forest of 3,000 menhirs in the space of four kilometres. Was that not enough ancient monuments to satisfy the historians, the tourists and the Ministry of Culture in Paris? Too late. A passing busy-body had noticed the unearthed menhir. Work on the bungalows was halted. An archaeological dig was ordered.

As a result, our knowledge of early human history may be transformed - or at least deeply enriched. Preliminary exploration of the site has just been completed. One of France's foremost experts on neolithic times calls the results a "miracle". Other experts speak of a "time machine".

The Ministry of Culture is in the process of designating the whole area - 10 times larger than the 3,000 square metre preliminary dig - as a place of overwhelming historical importance. In other words, the six new bungalows at Kerdruelland, near Belz, in Morbihan, will never be built.

To neolithic experts, the name Kerdruelland may yet come to have something of the same significance as Stonehenge or Carnac or Newgrange in Co. Meath. The site may provide - like a kind of modern-day Rosetta Stone- some of the clues to unlock the code of one of the most important but puzzling chapters in human development.

The middle and late-neolithic (or Stone Age) and early Bronze Age in western Europe - ....- was a period of rapid and revolutionary advance. ...He progressed from cave-painting to the building of elaborate stone and earth tombs and - many years before the Egyptian pyramids - to the construction of carefully plotted and painstakingly laboured alignments and circles of standing stones. There are 3,000 of them in Britain, Ireland and Brittany alone. They are also scattered from Denmark to Portugal and southern Italy. Much has been discovered about the period in the past 50 years. Much remains utterly mysterious.

Archaeologists working on the Kerdruelland site over the past nine months have discovered not one but 60 "lost" menhirs. They believe that they were erected - and then destroyed - during the "middle period" of the standing stones era in western Europe, in around 2500 BC. (This was about the same time that the main ring at Stonehenge was constructed, possibly by invaders from Brittany).

Because the Kerdruelland menhirs have been preserved in mud and silt for 4,500 years, they should offer important new information on how such alignments were created and why. At the well-known sites, such as Carnac and Stonehenge, some of the stones have been moved or propped up or stolen or added over the centuries. Here the stones, up to 2m long, lie just as they did after they were felled four-and-half millennia ago.

At neolithic sites elsewhere, the soil of the period has been eroded by the ravages of time and man. At Kerdruelland, the neolithic sub-soil - the soil on which the stones were erected - has been preserved intact. This offers a cornucopia of possible new archaeological finds. Already, a brief dig has yielded a rich harvest of flint tools and shards of pottery.

Just as importantly, the preservation of the neolithic sub-soil will help the experts to discover traces of the original earthworks and study the methods of assembling and positioning the menhirs.

The fact that the stones were erected, and then deliberately toppled, at roughly the same time, is also an important discovery. It offers new evidence that the neolithic was a period of social and religious upheavals, revolutions and wars. In other words, the neolithic may have been "megalithic" - obsessed with whacking great stones - but it was not socially or culturally monolithic. Ancient man was as fractious and destructive as modern man.

Professor Jean-Paul Demoule is president of the French agency which undertakes urgent archaeological digs on threatened sites - L'Institut national de recherches arch ologiques pr ventives (Inrap) - which undertook the preliminary dig at Kerdruelland. He is also one of France's, and the world's, leading experts on the neolithic era: "This site is, historically and archaeologically speaking, a miracle," he told The Independent. "It is a great paradox. Precisely because it was destroyed, it has been preserved: like the wreck of an ancient ship beneath the ocean."

"The great neolithic sites like Stonehenge, such as Carnac, have come down to us, still standing, through the millennia and we can look at them as we imagine that they always were. But we cannot be sure that they were exactly that way and - most importantly - the soil in which they were planted has gone. If you dig at Stonehenge or Carnac today, you are mostly digging into the soil of previous ages, before the stones were placed there. Here, we are digging into the neolithic soil itself, the soil on which the erectors, and destroyers, of the stones once stood and lived."

Stephan Hinguant, 43, the chief archaeologist on the site, said: "This is as a truly astonishing find, a time machine. We have only explored a small part of it, and very rapidly, but we have found enough to know that there is a treasury of information here which will take several years to uncover fully.

"We have found 60 stones, some complete, some broken, but we believe that there must be many more in the surrounding site. Once we have established where the stones originally stood, we will be able to draw conclusions, based on scientific fact, not on guesswork. The artefacts we find in the soil and evidence of how the stones were placed upright could make enormous contributions to our understanding of neolithic culture..."

Until the archaeological work resumes, probably next year, the experts are unwilling to say whether the stones originally formed lines, or a circle, or, typically for Brittany, a horse-shoe.

Kerdruelland today is a banal stretch of seaside suburbia. Here and there a huge lump of rough, yellow-orange coloured granite pokes through the plastic protecting the site from summer storms. To have some idea of how Kerdruelland must have looked 4,000 years ago, you do not have to go far. Eight miles to the east are the three vast alignments of stones, and their associated "cromlechs", or large stone circles, near the village of Carnac.

The stones are large and small, straight and jagged, mostly erected just as they were found. They stretch into the distance, like rotting giants' teeth, offering little clue as to why they were strung out over such a large area.

Neolithic historians believe that the original rows of stones at Carnac were a kind of ceremonial avenue, leading to a large enclosure of stones or "cromlechs", where ritual gatherings took place. The first stones may have been erected around 3500 BC - 1,000 years before those at Kerdruelland.

In his seminal, recently republished work The Stone circles of Britain, Ireland and Brittany (Yale University Press), the British neolithic expert, Aubrey Burl, suggests that the original, simple avenues at Carnac were augmented and muddled until Roman times, and maybe even more recently, by an annoying local habit of adding a couple of stones each year.

Hence, the frustrations of neolithic archaeologists and historians. Professor Burl also refers despairingly to a stone circle at Hampton Down in Dorset. A photograph from 1908 shows 16 pillars. By 1964, there was a ring of 28. Later excavation suggested that only eight were genuine. But which ones? Professor Burl also complains that our understanding of standing stones has been warped by Stonehenge, which is extraordinary but atypical.

Most circles use stones which were lying around near by. Rock was rarely quarried or carried very far. The "sarsen" stones in the main ring at Stonehenge are an exception. They came from 20 miles away. It is estimated that it would have taken 200 men to drag each slab 100m a day. The ambitious "lintels" joining the sarsen stones at Stonehenge do not occur in any other neolithic monument.

Mr Burl insists that the Wiltshire masterpiece is a "unique example of megalithic madness". Most other stone circles are more modest and could have been put together little by little, and changed over the centuries, by small clans or family groups.

But why build stone circles or alignments at all? In a book published last year, Inside the Neolithic Mind (Thames and Hudson), David Lewis-Williams and David Pearce try to psychoanalyse the late stone age. They bring together archaeological evidence from the Middle East, western Europe and modern scientific studies of the chemistry of the brain. The results are sometimes far fetched but the book traces a convincing progression from cave art to stone circles.

Professor Jean-Paul Demoule says that it is clear that the neolithic period was "not a calm river of slow evolution" but a "period of violent upheavals, wars and revolutions" as cultural and religious groups fought and colonised one another. In no other site before the discovery of Kerdruelland, however, have archaeologists found a large group of standing stones which were toppled but not re-used.

For this reason alone, the site offers the prospect of startling new discoveries and insights in the years ahead. It is a pity about the bungalows. However, southern Brittany, though crammed with ancient monuments, is not short of a few bungalows.

2. Question from Baruch: Will France Invade Israel?
Baruch Ben Chayil <> wrote:
Dear Mr Davidiy
I read the following in the Zohar 1:235b: Have you any comments? Who are the Bnei Reuben today?

R' Shimon said: The descendants of Reuben were destined to wage two wars in the land (one when they entered the land with the other tribes in the
days of Joshua, and one in the future during the days of Mashiah)... In
the exile of Assyria (the exile of the ten tribes by Salmanesser), the
descendants of Reuben and Gad were the first of all the tribes to be
exiled... and till now they have not returned (i.e. since the ten tribes
were exiled, no tribe ever returned in its entirety, but individuals
from all of those tribes did return to be amalgamated back into the
tribe of Yehudah) (in the future, however, before Mashiah, they will all

... At the time when the King Messiah will arouse in the world, they
(the descendants of Reuven) will go forth and wage wars in the world,
conquering and overpowering nations. Inhabitants of the world will fear
them and tremble before them. They will plan to seize the kingship but
will not retain it (mistakenly thinking that, since Reuven was the
eldest, they are the Israelite tribe that is destined to rule the world;
whereas true rulership was given eternally to Yehudah)... Why will they
not remain in kingship, even in a single corner in the world (i.e. not
even one little kingdom under the rule of Mashiah ben David from the
tribe of Yehudah)? For "you (Reuven) mounted your father's bed"
(Genesis) -- for they are destined to enter and wage war in the Holy
Land. "Your father's bed," this refers specifically to Jerusalem! (the
"bed" i.e. the dwelling place of the Indwelling Presence of the Holy One

... The descendants of  Reuven have been scattered in exile to all four
corners of the world (paralleling Israel's four exiles to the four
cornes of the world)... Similarly, they are destined to wage war in the
four corners  of the world and to gain dominion through battle over all,
conquering many  nations and ruling over them.

Brit-Am Answer:
Baruch Shalom,
Good to see other people noticing these passages.
We identify Reuben with France.
We quoted from this same source in our work "The Tribes"
and later at more length in an article in our magazine
"Brit-Am Truth" issue no. 6
"Tribal Identity REUBEN: Will The French Invade Israel?"
<In "The Tribes" we said:
<<Some points of interest are that: The sons of Reuben were destined (Zohar, VaYechi, 551, Sulam Edition) to wage war in the LAND OF ISRAEL against (or for) Jerusalem. It was the French "Franks" who led the Crusaders of Europe (1069-1270) in their attempts to conquer the Holy Land and Jerusalem. The French Emperor, Napoleon Bonaparte in 1799 offered to restore Palestine to the Jews. Whether Bonaparte had been genuine in his intention or not, it was the French together with the British who created the political climate which made possible the Balfour Declaration and ultimately the State of Israel. French Gentile volunteers fought on the Jewish side in Israel's War of Independence (1948 -1949). >>

<We noted above that, "the sons of Reuben were destined (Zohar, VaYechi, 551, Sulam Edition) to wage war in the LAND OF ISRAEL against (or for) Jerusalem" and we suggested that this was fulfilled by the Crusades. A renewed examination of the passage in the Zohar together with Commentaries indicates that if anything the Crusades were only a prototype of what could take place later. The Zohar indicates that in the Last Days Reuben will fight against Jerusalem in the Land of Israel and Reuben will be punished for this.  This will be associated with a world-wide war immediately preceding the Messianic Era. Today France is one of the leading nations pushing for an increased EU European Union presence in the Land of Israel.>

Our explanation was in line with that of major commentators (e.g. "Matok meDevash")
but today I would be reserved about it.
The Zohar itself does not say that France will necessarily fight against Judah
though there are sources that imply that Reuben and/or the Lost Ten Tribes
may do so.

Maimonides warned us not to speculate about these matters too much
but to believe and wait until they come and only after they come interpret
the passages in the light of events that have occurred.

On a personal note you inserted your own explanations in the translation
using rounded paragraphs ( ). It is customary in such cases to use [ ] paragraphs
to indicate that the paragraphs are one's own explanation and not part of the original.

You translated:
... The descendants of  Reuven have been scattered in exile to all four
corners of the world (paralleling Israel's four exiles to the four
corners of the world)... .

Translating literally from
The Sulam edition of the Zohar (VaYechi, 549) we would render this passage:
<< To the four corners of the earth, were scattered the Children of Reuben in Exile,
parallel to all Israel who were exiled in Exile to the four corners of the earth, four times,
to the four corners of the earth...>>

This could mean almost anything.
We would suggest a simple straightforward meaning to be that the Children of Reuben were exiled
along with other Israelites and in their place of Exile uprooted and exiled again
and again and again until coming to a resting place.
This is in accordance with other passages that associate Reuben with the Rest of
the Lost Ten Tribes who in the Latter Days will be concentrated together in specific areas.

The Midrash (Numbers Rabah 1;6, Eichah Rabah 2;9, Jerusalemi Sanhedrin ch.17, L.6,29) on these verses, comments:

          ~Rabbi Berachiah and Rabbi Chelbo in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman said: To three places was Israel exiled, one to beyond the Sambation River, one to Daphneh of Antiochia, and one to where  the Clouds came down and covered them; in the same way that they [i.e.the northern Israelites west of the Jordan River] were exiled to three places, so too were the Tribes [east of the Jordan River] of Reuben, Gad, and half Menasseh, exiled to three places. When they shall return so too will Reuben, Gad, and half Menasseh return with them. How do we know all this?
          ~` From the verse, "Say to the prisoners go forth" (Isaiah 49;9).

See the Brit-Am Commentary to Isaiah 9:2

See also the Brit-Am identification of Reuben in France

See the identification of the Sons of Reuben with Tsarfat (France in Hebrew)
according to the Biblical Codes.

See the location of the Lost Ten Tribes in France and its neighbors
according to Rashi and the Commentaries:

 3. Steve Mathe: Message from the Irish Psalms
From: Steve Mathe <>
Subject: Re: Update on Psalms 83 & 84

Yair, Shalom!
There is an update about the Irish bog find of book of Psalms with Psalm 83  exposed first...
Now it turns out there was some initial confusion due to a different numbering system used in the Latin Vulgate version.  It was Psalm 84 that was open, which refers to the Beka Valley,  now a Hezbollah stronghold.  In either case, mistake or no mistake, Psalm 84 or Psalm 83, peoples' attention is drawn where it needs to be,  God's Word about what is going on and what we need to do.... .. the Word went forth, and am sure a lot of people were influenced..... to the better.
Steve Mathe
"Only Torah and prayer will unify Israel."